Accurate and Regret-Aware Numerical Problem Solver for Tabular Question Answering
Yuxiang Wang, Jianzhong Qi, Junhao Gan
Abstract
Question answering on free-form tables (a.k.a. TableQA) is a challenging task because of the flexible structure and complex schema of tables. Recent studies use Large Language Models (LLMs) for this task, exploiting their capability in understanding the questions and tabular data, which are typically given in natural language and contain many textual fields, respectively. While this approach has shown promising results, it overlooks the challenges brought by numerical values which are common in tabular data, and LLMs are known to struggle with such values. We aim to address this issue, and we propose a model named TabLaP that uses LLMs as a planner rather than an answer generator. This approach exploits LLMs' capability in multi-step reasoning while leaving the actual numerical calculations to a Python interpreter for accurate calculation. Recognizing the inaccurate nature of LLMs, we further make a first attempt to quantify the trustworthiness of the answers produced by TabLaP, such that users can use TabLaP in a regret-aware manner. Experimental results on two benchmark datasets show that TabLaP is substantially more accurate than the state-of-the-art models, improving the answer accuracy by 5.7% and 5.8% on the two datasets, respectively.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6d6ba368-59be-4b49-bd16-2d9c3d44da75Cited by top-tier papers2
- Table Question Answering in the Era of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Tasks, Methods, and EvaluationWei Zhou, Bolei Ma, Annemarie Friedrich, Mohsen MesgarACL 2026 · 3 citations
- Syllogism-Inspired TableQA: Evidentialization Makes Decomposition Reasoning and Answer Verification More ReliableZhe Zhang, Lili Bai, Chaopeng Guo, Jie SongAAAI 2026
Builds on17
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and ComprehensionMike Lewis, Yinhan Liu, Naman Goyal, Marjan Ghazvininejad et al.ACL 2020 · 1,224 citations
- DIN-SQL: Decomposed In-Context Learning of Text-to-SQL with Self-CorrectionMohammadreza Pourreza, Davood RafieiNeurIPS 2023 · 909 citations
- PAL: Program-aided Language ModelsLuyu Gao, Aman Madaan, Shuyan Zhou, Uri Alon et al.ICML 2023 · 700 citations
Related papers
- TrustTable: A Neuro-Symbolic Auditing Framework for Faithful Table QAGuangzhen Zhao, Dechang Kong, Tongyu Wu, Zhenjiang DongACL 2026
- Knowledge Exchange with Confidence: Cost-Effective LLM Integration for Reliable and Efficient Visual Question AnsweringMahsa Mozaffari, Hitesh Sapkota, Xumin Liu, Qi YuICLR 2026
- CompTab: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Real-World TableQA with Complex Reasoning and Irregular TablesZhen Yang, Wei Du, Jie Wang, Wenze Zhou et al.ACL 2026
- Question Answering as Programming for Solving Time-Sensitive QuestionsXinyu Zhu, Cheng Yang, Bei Chen, Siheng Li et al.EMNLP 2023 · 6 citations
- Weaver: Interweaving SQL and LLM for Table ReasoningRohit Khoja, Devanshu Gupta, Yanjie Fu, Dan Roth et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
