CompTab: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Real-World TableQA with Complex Reasoning and Irregular Tables
Zhen Yang, Wei Du, Jie Wang, Wenze Zhou, Xiangfeng Meng, Zhengyang Wang, Suping Sun, Ziwei Du, Haodong Zou, Jie Chen, Yongbin Liu, Shicheng Tan
Abstract
Recent progress in Large Language Model (LLM) based Table Question Answering (TableQA) has demonstrated strong performance on standard benchmarks. However, existing benchmarks mainly focus on wellstructured tables and fail to reflect the irregular structures and complex reasoning commonly encountered in real-world scenarios. We propose CompTab, a benchmark designed to evaluate TableQA under complex reasoning and irregular table conditions. CompTab covers six representative types, including semantic ambiguity, multi-hop reasoning, transposed tables, merged cells, missing values, and outliers. It is constructed from real-world seed tables across multiple domains using controlled LLM based generation and human verification to ensure realism and diversity. In addition, to improve the generalization of LLMs under complex and irregular table settings, we propose a two-stage training framework that progressively aligns models with textual reasoning and executable decision signals, instantiated as CompTabLLM. Evaluations on 38 representative LLMs and CompTabLLM show clear limitations of existing LLMs under realistic conditions, while the proposed framework improves generalization. CompTab thus provides a challenging benchmark for advancing TableQA in real-world. The dataset will be released here.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8b0746d7-d7b5-41c0-b9d6-00f119a309acBuilds on9
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- TabFact: A Large-scale Dataset for Table-based Fact VerificationWenhu Chen, Hongmin Wang, Jianshu Chen, Yunkai Zhang et al.ICLR 2020 · 674 citations
- Agentic Reasoning: A Streamlined Framework for Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Agentic ToolsJunde Wu, Jiayuan Zhu, Yuyuan Liu, Min Xu et al.ACL 2025 · 88 citations
- RATT: A Thought Structure for Coherent and Correct LLM ReasoningJinghan Zhang, Xiting Wang, Weijieying Ren, Lu Jiang et al.AAAI 2025 · 51 citations
- Text2Analysis: A Benchmark of Table Question Answering with Advanced Data Analysis and Unclear QueriesXinyi He, Mengyu Zhou, Xinrun Xu, Xiaojun Ma et al.AAAI 2024 · 48 citations
Related papers
- MMQA: Evaluating LLMs with Multi-Table Multi-Hop Complex QuestionsJian Wu, Linyi Yang, Dongyuan Li, Yuliang Ji et al.ICLR 2025
- TopBench: A Benchmark for Implicit Predictive Reasoning in Tabular Question AnsweringAn-Yang Ji, Jun-Peng Jiang, De-Chuan Zhan, Han-Jia YeICML 2026 · 1 citation
- MMTableBench: A Multi-level Multimodal Benchmark for Reasoning and Layout Complexity in Table QAXianjie Wu, Xiaohang Xu, Tingyu Jiang, Jian Yang et al.WWW 2026 · 3 citations
- ODUTQA-MDC: A Task for Open-Domain Underspecified Tabular QA with Multi-turn Dialogue-based ClarificationZhensheng Wang, ZhanTeng Lin, Wenmian Yang, Kun Zhou et al.ACL 2026
- TableEval: A Real-World Benchmark for Complex, Multilingual, and Multi-Structured Table Question AnsweringJunnan Zhu, Jingyi Wang, Bohan Yu, Xiaoyu Wu et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
