Venire: A Machine Learning-Guided Panel Review System for Community Content Moderation
Vinay Koshy, Frederick Choi, Yi-Shyuan Chiang, Hari Sundaram, Eshwar Chandrasekharan, Karrie Karahalios
Abstract
Research into community content moderation often assumes that moderation teams govern with a single, unified voice. However, recent work has found that moderators disagree with one another at modest, but concerning rates. The problem is not the root disagreements themselves. Subjectivity in moderation is unavoidable, and there are clear benefits to including diverse perspectives within a moderation team. Instead, the crux of the issue is that, due to resource constraints, moderation decisions end up being made by individual decision-makers. The result is decision-making that is inconsistent, which is frustrating for community members. To address this, we develop Venire, an ML-backed system for panel review on Reddit. Venire uses a machine learning model trained on log data to identify the cases where moderators are most likely to disagree. Venire fast-tracks these cases for multi-person review. Ideally, Venire allows moderators to surface and resolve disagreements that would have otherwise gone unnoticed. We conduct three studies through which we design and evaluate Venire: a set of formative interviews with moderators, technical evaluations on two datasets, and a think-aloud study in which moderators used Venire to make decisions on real moderation cases. Quantitatively, we demonstrate that Venire is able to improve decision consistency and surface latent disagreements. Qualitatively, we find that Venire helps moderators resolve difficult moderation cases more confidently. Venire represents a novel paradigm for human-AI content moderation, and shifts the conversation from replacing human decision-making to supporting it.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6b8ce23c-b6f5-4796-98bd-0ed09d639913Cited by top-tier papers6
- PolicyCraft: Supporting Collaborative and Participatory Policy Design through Case-Grounded DeliberationTzu-Sheng Kuo, Quan Ze Chen, Amy X. Zhang, Jane Hsieh et al.CHI 2025 · 26 citations
- Needling Through the Threads: A Visualization Tool for Navigating Threaded Online DiscussionsYijun Liu, Frederick Choi, Eshwar ChandrasekharanCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Botender: Supporting Communities in Collaboratively Designing AI Agents through Case-Based ProvocationsTzu-Sheng Kuo, Sophia Liu, Quan Ze Chen, Joseph Seering et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- "Think about it like you're a firefighter": Understanding How Reddit Moderators Use the ModqueueTanvi Bajpai, Eshwar ChandrasekharanCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- MoMoE: Mixture of Moderation Experts Framework for AI-Assisted Online GovernanceAgam Goyal, Xianyang Zhan, Yilun Chen, Koustuv Saha et al.EMNLP 2025
Builds on14
- Toward a Perspectivist Turn in Ground Truthing for Predictive ComputingFederico Cabitza, Andrea Campagner, Valerio BasileAAAI 2023 · 236 citations
- Jury Learning: Integrating Dissenting Voices into Machine Learning ModelsMitchell L. Gordon, Michelle S. Lam, Joon Sung Park, Kayur Patel et al.CHI 2022 · 134 citations
- Personalizing Content Moderation on Social Media: User Perspectives on Moderation Choices, Interface Design, and LaborShagun Jhaver, Alice Qian Zhang, Quan Ze Chen, Nikhila Natarajan et al.CSCW 2023 · 87 citations
- ORES: Lowering Barriers with Participatory Machine Learning in WikipediaAaron Halfaker, R. Stuart GeigerCSCW 2020 · 84 citations
- "I'm not sure what difference is between their content and mine, other than the person itself": A Study of Fairness Perception of Content Moderation on YouTubeRenkai Ma, Yubo KouCSCW 2022 · 42 citations
Related papers
- Reliance and Automation for Human-AI Collaborative Data Labeling Conflict ResolutionMichelle Brachman, Zahra Ashktorab, Michael Desmond, Evelyn Duesterwald et al.CSCW 2022 · 16 citations
- Can Online Juries Make Consistent, Repeatable Decisions?Xinlan Emily Hu, Mark E. Whiting, Michael S. BernsteinCHI 2021 · 60 citations
- More Isn't Always Better: Balancing Decision Accuracy and Conformity Pressures in Multi-AI AdviceYuta Tsuchiya, Yukino BabaCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Collaborative Disagreement Resolution for Scalable OversightYuyang Jiang, Chacha Chen, Teng Wu, Liwen Sun et al.ICML 2026
- PerspectiveMod: A Perspectivist Resource for Deliberative ModerationEva Maria Vecchi, Neele Falk, Carlotta Quensel, Iman Jundi et al.EMNLP 2025
