Perceptions and Preferences: Deaf ASL-Signing Users' Insights on Video Elements, Styles and Layouts
Khulood Alkhudaidi, Tish Burke, Rachel Boll, Shruti Mahajan, Erin Treacy Solovey, Jeanne Reis
Abstract
Video components are a central element of user interfaces that deliver content in a signed language (SL), but the potential of video components extends beyond content accessibility. Sign language videos may be designed as user interface elements: layered with interactive features to create navigation cues, page headings, and menu options. To be effective for signing users, novel sign language video-rich interfaces require informed design choices across many parameters. To align with the specific needs and shared conventions of the Deaf community and other ASL-signers in this context, we present a user study involving deaf ASL-signers who interacted with an array of designs for sign language video elements. Their responses offer some insights into how the Deaf community may perceive and prefer video elements to be designed, positioned, and implemented to guide user experiences. Through a qualitative analysis, we take initial steps toward understanding deaf ASL-signers’ perceptions of a set of emerging design principles, paving the way for future SL-centric user interfaces containing customized video elements and layouts with primary consideration for signed language-related usage and requirements.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 681ac15e-3f0e-4334-9067-b5ba48db68d5Cited by top-tier papers2
- Reimagining Sign Language Technologies: Analyzing Translation Work of Chinese Deaf Online Content CreatorsXinru Tang, Anne Marie PiperCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Designing Multi-Robot Ground Video Sensemaking with Public Safety ProfessionalsPuqi Zhou, Ali Asgarov, Aafiya Hussain, Wonjoon Park et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on11
- Social App Accessibility for Deaf SignersKelly Mack, Danielle Bragg, Meredith Ringel Morris, Maarten W. Bos et al.CSCW 2020 · 52 citations
- Remotely Co-Designing Features for Communication Applications using Automatic Captioning with Deaf and Hearing PairsMatthew Seita, Sooyeon Lee, Sarah Andrew, Kristen Shinohara et al.CHI 2022 · 51 citations
- Social, Environmental, and Technical: Factors at Play in the Current Use and Future Design of Small-Group CaptioningEmma J. McDonnell, Ping Liu, Steven M. Goodman, Raja S. Kushalnagar et al.CSCW 2021 · 50 citations
- "In this online environment, we're limited": : Exploring Inclusive Video Conferencing Design for SignersJazz Rui Xia Ang, Ping Liu, Emma McDonnell, Sarah CoppolaCHI 2022 · 41 citations
- RubySlippers: Supporting Content-based Voice Navigation for How-to VideosMinsuk Chang, Mina Huh, Juho KimCHI 2021 · 40 citations
Related papers
- Towards Sign Language-Centric Design of ASL Survey ToolsShruti Mahajan, Zoey Walker, Rachel Boll, Michelle Santacreu et al.CHI 2022 · 14 citations
- Towards AI-driven Sign Language Generation with Non-manual MarkersHan Zhang, Rotem Shalev-Arkushin, Vasileios Baltatzis, Connor Gillis et al.CHI 2025 · 12 citations
- Community-Driven Information Accessibility: Online Sign Language Content Creation within d/Deaf CommunitiesXinru Tang, Xiang Chang, Nuoran Chen, Yingjie (MaoMao) Ni et al.CHI 2023 · 21 citations
- Redesigning Educational Videos for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing LearnersSi Chen, Haocong Cheng, Suzy Su, Lu Ming et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Exploring Collection of Sign Language Videos through CrowdsourcingDanielle Bragg, Abraham Glasser, Fyodor Minakov, Naomi Caselli et al.CSCW 2022 · 7 citations
