When LLMs Play the Telephone Game: Cultural Attractors as Conceptual Tools to Evaluate LLMs in Multi-turn Settings
Jérémy Perez, Grgur Kovac, Corentin Léger, Cédric Colas, Gaia Molinaro, Maxime Derex, Pierre-Yves Oudeyer, Clément Moulin-Frier
Abstract
As large language models (LLMs) start interacting with each other and generating an increasing amount of text online, it becomes crucial to better understand how information is transformed as it passes from one LLM to the next. While significant research has examined individual LLM behaviors, existing studies have largely overlooked the collective behaviors and information distortions arising from iterated LLM interactions. Small biases, negligible at the single output level, risk being amplified in iterated interactions, potentially leading the content to evolve towards attractor states. In a series of telephone game experiments, we apply a transmission chain design borrowed from the human cultural evolution literature: LLM agents iteratively receive, produce, and transmit texts from the previous to the next agent in the chain. By tracking the evolution of text toxicity, positivity, difficulty, and length across transmission chains, we uncover the existence of biases and attractors, and study their dependence on the initial text, the instructions, language model, and model size. For instance, we find that more open-ended instructions lead to stronger attraction effects compared to more constrained tasks. We also find that different text properties display different sensitivity to attraction effects, with toxicity leading to stronger attractors than length. These findings highlight the importance of accounting for multi-step transmission dynamics and represent a first step towards a more comprehensive understanding of LLM cultural dynamics.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 66337bbc-16ba-4a44-9179-ced074f45660Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on10
- Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human BehaviorJoon Sung Park, Joseph C. O'Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris et al.UIST 2023 · 1,882 citations
- Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?Shibani Santurkar, Esin Durmus, Faisal Ladhak, Cinoo Lee et al.ICML 2023 · 764 citations
- In-Context Impersonation Reveals Large Language Models' Strengths and BiasesLeonard Salewski, Stephan Alaniz, Isabel Rio-Torto, Eric Schulz et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 259 citations
- Social Simulacra: Creating Populated Prototypes for Social Computing SystemsJoon Sung Park, Lindsay Popowski, Carrie J. Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris et al.UIST 2022 · 192 citations
- AngleKindling: Supporting Journalistic Angle Ideation with Large Language ModelsSavvas Petridis, Nicholas Diakopoulos, Kevin Crowston, Mark Hansen et al.CHI 2023 · 94 citations
Related papers
- LLM as a Broken Telephone: Iterative Generation Distorts InformationAmr Mohamed, Mingmeng Geng, Michalis Vazirgiannis, Guokan ShangACL 2025
- LLM See, LLM Do: Leveraging Active Inheritance to Target Non-Differentiable ObjectivesLuísa Shimabucoro, Sebastian Ruder, Julia Kreutzer, Marzieh Fadaee et al.EMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
- Bias Amplification in Language Model Evolution: An Iterated Learning PerspectiveYi Ren, Shangmin Guo, Linlu Qiu, Bailin Wang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 23 citations
- Bias in the Mirror : Are LLMs opinions robust to their own adversarial attacksVirgile Rennard, Christos Xypolopoulos, Michalis VazirgiannisACL 2025 · 8 citations
- When Smiley Turns Hostile: Interpreting How Emojis Trigger LLMs' ToxicityShiyao Cui, Xijia Feng, Yingkang Wang, Junxiao Yang et al.AAAI 2026
