Bias Amplification in Language Model Evolution: An Iterated Learning Perspective
Yi Ren, Shangmin Guo, Linlu Qiu, Bailin Wang, Danica J. Sutherland
Abstract
With the widespread adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs), the prevalence of iterative interactions among these models is anticipated to increase. Notably, recent advancements in multi-round self-improving methods allow LLMs to generate new examples for training subsequent models. At the same time, multi-agent LLM systems, involving automated interactions among agents, are also increasing in prominence. Thus, in both short and long terms, LLMs may actively engage in an evolutionary process. We draw parallels between the behavior of LLMs and the evolution of human culture, as the latter has been extensively studied by cognitive scientists for decades. Our approach involves leveraging Iterated Learning (IL), a Bayesian framework that elucidates how subtle biases are magnified during human cultural evolution, to explain some behaviors of LLMs. This paper outlines key characteristics of agents' behavior in the Bayesian-IL framework, including predictions that are supported by experimental verification with various LLMs. This theoretical framework could help to more effectively predict and guide the evolution of LLMs in desired directions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers9
- Evolution and compression in LLMs: on the emergence of human-aligned categorizationNathaniel Imel, Noga ZaslavskyICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Losing our Tail, Again: (Un)Natural Selection & Multilingual LLMsEva VanmassenhoveACL 2026 · 1 citation
- MACPO: Weak-to-Strong Alignment via Multi-Agent Contrastive Preference OptimizationYougang Lyu, Lingyong Yan, Zihan Wang, Dawei Yin et al.ICLR 2025
- Iterative Label Refinement Matters More than Preference Optimization under Weak SupervisionYaowen Ye, Cassidy Laidlaw, Jacob SteinhardtICLR 2025
- The Lock-in Hypothesis: Stagnation by AlgorithmTianyi Qiu, Zhonghao He, Tejasveer Chugh, Max Kleiman-WeinerICML 2025
Builds on11
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
- An Explanation of In-context Learning as Implicit Bayesian InferenceSang Michael Xie, Aditi Raghunathan, Percy Liang, Tengyu MaICLR 2022 · 1,030 citations
- Self-Rewarding Language ModelsWeizhe Yuan, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Kyunghyun Cho, Xian Li et al.ICML 2024 · 569 citations
- Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language ModelsZixiang Chen, Yihe Deng, Huizhuo Yuan, Kaixuan Ji et al.ICML 2024 · 527 citations
Related papers
- When LLMs Play the Telephone Game: Cultural Attractors as Conceptual Tools to Evaluate LLMs in Multi-turn SettingsJérémy Perez, Grgur Kovac, Corentin Léger, Cédric Colas et al.ICLR 2025
- Systematic Biases in LLM Simulations of DebatesAmir Taubenfeld, Yaniv Dover, Roi Reichart, Ariel GoldsteinEMNLP 2024 · 35 citations
- Bias in the Mirror : Are LLMs opinions robust to their own adversarial attacksVirgile Rennard, Christos Xypolopoulos, Michalis VazirgiannisACL 2025 · 8 citations
- BED-LLM: Intelligent Information Gathering with LLMs and Bayesian Experimental DesignDeepro Choudhury, Sinead Williamson, Adam Golinski, Ning Miao et al.ICLR 2026 · 24 citations
- Enough Coin Flips Can Make LLMs Act BayesianRitwik Gupta, Rodolfo Corona, Jiaxin Ge, Eric Wang et al.ACL 2025
