Improving Deep Reinforcement Learning by Reducing the Chain Effect of Value and Policy Churn
Hongyao Tang, Glen Berseth
Abstract
Deep neural networks provide Reinforcement Learning (RL) powerful function approximators to address large-scale decision-making problems. However, these approximators introduce challenges due to the non-stationary nature of RL training. One source of the challenges in RL is that output predictions can churn, leading to uncontrolled changes after each batch update for states not included in the batch. Although such a churn phenomenon exists in each step of network training, how churn occurs and impacts RL remains under-explored. In this work, we start by characterizing churn in a view of Generalized Policy Iteration with function approximation, and we discover a chain effect of churn that leads to a cycle where the churns in value estimation and policy improvement compound and bias the learning dynamics throughout the iteration. Further, we concretize the study and focus on the learning issues caused by the chain effect in different settings, including greedy action deviation in value-based methods, trust region violation in proximal policy optimization, and dual bias of policy value in actor-critic methods. We then propose a method to reduce the chain effect across different settings, called Churn Approximated ReductIoN (CHAIN), which can be easily plugged into most existing DRL algorithms. Our experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in both reducing churn and improving learning performance across online and offline, value-based and policy-based RL settings, as well as a scaling setting.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 661ed4f0-63d5-4d4f-8287-51413b2c77b2Cited by top-tier papers7
- Emergence of Exploration in Policy Gradient Reinforcement Learning via RetryingSoichiro Nishimori, Paavo Parmas, Sotetsu Koyamada, Tadashi Kozuno et al.ICML 2026 · 6 citations
- COLA: Towards Efficient Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning with Conflict Objective Regularization in Latent SpacePengyi Li, Hongyao Tang, Yifu Yuan, Jianye Hao et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- The Ladder in Chaos: Improving Policy Learning by Harnessing the Parameter Evolving Path in A Low-dimensional SpaceHongyao Tang, Min Zhang, Chen Chen, Jianye HaoNeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations
- Scalable Reinforcement Learning via Adaptive Batch ScalingJongchan ParkICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Mitigating Plasticity Loss in Continual Reinforcement Learning by Reducing ChurnHongyao Tang, Johan S. Obando-Ceron, Pablo Samuel Castro, Aaron C. Courville et al.ICML 2025
Builds on32
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-LearningIlya Kostrikov, Ashvin Nair, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 1,402 citations
- The Primacy Bias in Deep Reinforcement LearningEvgenii Nikishin, Max Schwarzer, Pierluca D'Oro, Pierre-Luc Bacon et al.ICML 2022 · 269 citations
- Controlling Overestimation Bias with Truncated Mixture of Continuous Distributional Quantile CriticsArsenii Kuznetsov, Pavel Shvechikov, Alexander Grishin, Dmitry P. VetrovICML 2020 · 266 citations
- Maxmin Q-learning: Controlling the Estimation Bias of Q-learningQingfeng Lan, Yangchen Pan, Alona Fyshe, Martha WhiteICLR 2020 · 213 citations
- Phasic Policy GradientKarl Cobbe, Jacob Hilton, Oleg Klimov, John SchulmanICML 2021 · 191 citations
Related papers
- No Representation, No Trust: Connecting Representation, Collapse, and Trust Issues in PPOSkander Moalla, Andrea Miele, Daniil Pyatko, Razvan Pascanu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 35 citations
- The Phenomenon of Policy ChurnTom Schaul, André Barreto, John Quan, Georg OstrovskiNeurIPS 2022 · 38 citations
- Learning Dynamics and Generalization in Deep Reinforcement LearningClare Lyle, Mark Rowland, Will Dabney, Marta Kwiatkowska et al.ICML 2022 · 40 citations
- Transient Non-stationarity and Generalisation in Deep Reinforcement LearningMaximilian Igl, Gregory Farquhar, Jelena Luketina, Wendelin Boehmer et al.ICLR 2021 · 104 citations
- What about Inputting Policy in Value Function: Policy Representation and Policy-Extended Value Function ApproximatorHongyao Tang, Zhaopeng Meng, Jianye Hao, Chen Chen et al.AAAI 2022 · 20 citations
