Learning Dynamics and Generalization in Deep Reinforcement Learning
Clare Lyle, Mark Rowland, Will Dabney, Marta Kwiatkowska, Yarin Gal
Abstract
Solving a reinforcement learning (RL) problem poses two competing challenges: fitting a potentially discontinuous value function, and generalizing well to new observations. In this paper, we analyze the learning dynamics of temporal difference algorithms to gain novel insight into the tension between these two objectives. We show theoretically that temporal difference learning encourages agents to fit non-smooth components of the value function early in training, and at the same time induces the second-order effect of discouraging generalization. We corroborate these findings in deep RL agents trained on a range of environments, finding that neural networks trained using temporal difference algorithms on dense reward tasks exhibit weaker generalization between states than randomly initialized networks and networks trained with policy gradient methods. Finally, we investigate how post-training policy distillation may avoid this pitfall, and show that this approach improves generalization to novel environments in the ProcGen suite and improves robustness to input perturbations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1313c25a-e76b-4a0f-b866-cc169931207aCited by top-tier papers16
- Understanding Plasticity in Neural NetworksClare Lyle, Zeyu Zheng, Evgenii Nikishin, Bernardo Ávila Pires et al.ICML 2023 · 162 citations
- Mixtures of Experts Unlock Parameter Scaling for Deep RLJohan S. Obando-Ceron, Ghada Sokar, Timon Willi, Clare Lyle et al.ICML 2024 · 74 citations
- The Generalization Gap in Offline Reinforcement LearningIshita Mediratta, Qingfei You, Minqi Jiang, Roberta RaileanuICLR 2024 · 24 citations
- Improving Deep Reinforcement Learning by Reducing the Chain Effect of Value and Policy ChurnHongyao Tang, Glen BersethNeurIPS 2024 · 23 citations
- floq: Training Critics via Flow-Matching for Scaling Compute in Value-Based RLBhavya Agrawalla, Michal Nauman, Khush Agrawal, Aviral KumarICLR 2026 · 22 citations
Builds on21
- Image Augmentation Is All You Need: Regularizing Deep Reinforcement Learning from PixelsDenis Yarats, Ilya Kostrikov, Rob FergusICLR 2021 · 911 citations
- Reinforcement Learning with Augmented DataMichael Laskin, Kimin Lee, Adam Stooke, Lerrel Pinto et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 833 citations
- Leveraging Procedural Generation to Benchmark Reinforcement LearningKarl Cobbe, Christopher Hesse, Jacob Hilton, John SchulmanICML 2020 · 685 citations
- The Primacy Bias in Deep Reinforcement LearningEvgenii Nikishin, Max Schwarzer, Pierluca D'Oro, Pierre-Luc Bacon et al.ICML 2022 · 269 citations
- Deep learning versus kernel learning: an empirical study of loss landscape geometry and the time evolution of the Neural Tangent KernelStanislav Fort, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Mansheej Paul, Sepideh Kharaghani et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 255 citations
Related papers
- Interference and Generalization in Temporal Difference LearningEmmanuel Bengio, Joelle Pineau, Doina PrecupICML 2020 · 67 citations
- Transient Non-stationarity and Generalisation in Deep Reinforcement LearningMaximilian Igl, Gregory Farquhar, Jelena Luketina, Wendelin Boehmer et al.ICLR 2021 · 104 citations
- DNA: Proximal Policy Optimization with a Dual Network ArchitectureMatthew Aitchison, Penny SweetserNeurIPS 2022 · 7 citations
- DR3: Value-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning Requires Explicit RegularizationAviral Kumar, Rishabh Agarwal, Tengyu Ma, Aaron C. Courville et al.ICLR 2022 · 85 citations
- DRIBO: Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning via Multi-View Information BottleneckJiameng Fan, Wenchao LiICML 2022 · 49 citations
