Maxmin Q-learning: Controlling the Estimation Bias of Q-learning
Qingfeng Lan, Yangchen Pan, Alona Fyshe, Martha White
Abstract
Q-learning suffers from overestimation bias, because it approximates the maximum action value using the maximum estimated action value. Algorithms have been proposed to reduce overestimation bias, but we lack an understanding of how bias interacts with performance, and the extent to which existing algorithms mitigate bias. In this paper, we 1) highlight that the effect of overestimation bias on learning efficiency is environment-dependent; 2) propose a generalization of Q-learning, called Maxmin Q-learning, which provides a parameter to flexibly control bias; 3) show theoretically that there exists a parameter choice for Maxmin Q-learning that leads to unbiased estimation with a lower approximation variance than Q-learning; and 4) prove the convergence of our algorithm in the tabular case, as well as convergence of several previous Q-learning variants, using a novel Generalized Q-learning framework. We empirically verify that our algorithm better controls estimation bias in toy environments, and that it achieves superior performance on several benchmark problems.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6b29967c-6de7-41ea-a76d-9844987a795aCited by top-tier papers39
- Uncertainty-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning with Diversified Q-EnsembleGaon An, Seungyong Moon, Jang-Hyun Kim, Hyun Oh SongNeurIPS 2021 · 430 citations
- Controlling Overestimation Bias with Truncated Mixture of Continuous Distributional Quantile CriticsArsenii Kuznetsov, Pavel Shvechikov, Alexander Grishin, Dmitry P. VetrovICML 2020 · 266 citations
- SUNRISE: A Simple Unified Framework for Ensemble Learning in Deep Reinforcement LearningKimin Lee, Michael Laskin, Aravind Srinivas, Pieter AbbeelICML 2021 · 239 citations
- Dropout Q-Functions for Doubly Efficient Reinforcement LearningTakuya Hiraoka, Takahisa Imagawa, Taisei Hashimoto, Takashi Onishi et al.ICLR 2022 · 157 citations
- Softmax Deep Double Deterministic Policy GradientsLing Pan, Qingpeng Cai, Longbo HuangNeurIPS 2020 · 138 citations
Related papers
- Self-correcting Q-learningRong Zhu, Mattia RigottiAAAI 2021 · 22 citations
- ADDQ: Adaptive distributional double Q-learningLeif Döring, Benedikt Wille, Maximilian Birr, Mihail Bîrsan et al.ICML 2025
- Regularized Q-learning through Robust AveragingPeter Schmitt-Förster, Tobias SutterICML 2024
- Ensemble Bootstrapping for Q-LearningOren Peer, Chen Tessler, Nadav Merlis, Ron MeirICML 2021 · 56 citations
- Action Candidate Based Clipped Double Q-learning for Discrete and Continuous Action TasksHaobo Jiang, Jin Xie, Jian YangAAAI 2021 · 20 citations
