Out-of-Distribution Generalization on Graphs via Progressive Inference
Yiming Xu, Bin Shi, Zhen Peng, Huixiang Liu, Bo Dong, Chen Chen
Abstract
The development and evaluation of graph neural networks (GNNs) generally follow the independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) assumption. Yet this assumption is often untenable in practice due to the uncontrollable data generation mechanism. In particular, when the data distribution shows a significant shift, most GNNs would fail to produce reliable predictions and may even make decisions randomly. One of the most promising solutions to improve the model generalization is to pick out causal invariant parts in the input graph. Nonetheless, we observe a significant distribution gap between the causal parts learned by existing methods and the ground-truth, leading to undesirable performance. In response to the above issues, this paper presents GPro, a model that learns graph causal invariance with progressive inference. Specifically, the complicated graph causal invariant learning is decomposed into multiple intermediate inference steps from easy to hard, and the perception of GPro is continuously strengthened through a progressive inference process to extract causal features that are stable to distribution shifts. We also enlarge the training distribution by creating counterfactual samples to enhance the capability of the GPro in capturing the causal invariant parts. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our proposed GPro outperforms the state-ofthe-art methods by 4.91% on average. For datasets with more severe distribution shifts, the performance improvement can be up to 6.86%. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on17
- Supervised Contrastive LearningPrannay Khosla, Piotr Teterwak, Chen Wang, Aaron Sarna et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 7,049 citations
- Simple and Deep Graph Convolutional NetworksMing Chen, Zhewei Wei, Zengfeng Huang, Bolin Ding et al.ICML 2020 · 1,910 citations
- Do Transformers Really Perform Badly for Graph Representation?Chengxuan Ying, Tianle Cai, Shengjie Luo, Shuxin Zheng et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,632 citations
- Pick and Choose: A GNN-based Imbalanced Learning Approach for Fraud DetectionYang Liu, Xiang Ao, Zidi Qin, Jianfeng Chi et al.WWW 2021 · 527 citations
- A Meta-Transfer Objective for Learning to Disentangle Causal MechanismsYoshua Bengio, Tristan Deleu, Nasim Rahaman, Nan Rosemary Ke et al.ICLR 2020 · 371 citations
Related papers
- Learning Invariant Graph Representations for Out-of-Distribution GeneralizationHaoyang Li, Ziwei Zhang, Xin Wang, Wenwu ZhuNeurIPS 2022 · 170 citations
- Discovering Invariant Rationales for Graph Neural NetworksYingxin Wu, Xiang Wang, An Zhang, Xiangnan He et al.ICLR 2022 · 313 citations
- Quantifying Distributional Invariance in Causal Subgraph for IRM-Free Graph GeneralizationYang Qiu, Yixiong Zou, Jun Wang, Wei Liu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Size-Invariant Graph Representations for Graph Classification ExtrapolationsBeatrice Bevilacqua, Yangze Zhou, Bruno RibeiroICML 2021 · 124 citations
- Disentangling Invariant Subgraph via Variance Contrastive Estimation under Distribution ShiftsHaoyang Li, Xin Wang, Xueling Zhu, Weigao Wen et al.ICML 2025
