Discovering Invariant Rationales for Graph Neural Networks
Yingxin Wu, Xiang Wang, An Zhang, Xiangnan He, Tat-Seng Chua
Abstract
Intrinsic interpretability of graph neural networks (GNNs) is to find a small subset of the input graph's features -- rationale -- which guides the model prediction. Unfortunately, the leading rationalization models often rely on data biases, especially shortcut features, to compose rationales and make predictions without probing the critical and causal patterns. Moreover, such data biases easily change outside the training distribution. As a result, these models suffer from a huge drop in interpretability and predictive performance on out-of-distribution data. In this work, we propose a new strategy of discovering invariant rationale (DIR) to construct intrinsically interpretable GNNs. It conducts interventions on the training distribution to create multiple interventional distributions. Then it approaches the causal rationales that are invariant across different distributions while filtering out the spurious patterns that are unstable. Experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets validate the superiority of our DIR in terms of interpretability and generalization ability on graph classification over the leading baselines. Code and datasets are available at https://github.com/Wuyxin/DIR-GNN.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bfa22f01-31a3-4015-be31-c7d3b5c86a2dCited by top-tier papers95
- Interpretable and Generalizable Graph Learning via Stochastic Attention MechanismSiqi Miao, Mia Liu, Pan LiICML 2022 · 288 citations
- Learning Causally Invariant Representations for Out-of-Distribution Generalization on GraphsYongqiang Chen, Yonggang Zhang, Yatao Bian, Han Yang et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 246 citations
- Addressing Heterophily in Graph Anomaly Detection: A Perspective of Graph SpectrumYuan Gao, Xiang Wang, Xiangnan He, Zhenguang Liu et al.WWW 2023 · 189 citations
- Causal Attention for Interpretable and Generalizable Graph ClassificationYongduo Sui, Xiang Wang, Jiancan Wu, Min Lin et al.KDD 2022 · 166 citations
- Let Invariant Rationale Discovery Inspire Graph Contrastive LearningSihang Li, Xiang Wang, An Zhang, Yingxin Wu et al.ICML 2022 · 117 citations
Builds on12
- Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on GraphsWeihua Hu, Matthias Fey, Marinka Zitnik, Yuxiao Dong et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,935 citations
- Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Risk Extrapolation (REx)David Krueger, Ethan Caballero, Jörn-Henrik Jacobsen, Amy Zhang et al.ICML 2021 · 1,163 citations
- Parameterized Explainer for Graph Neural NetworkDongsheng Luo, Wei Cheng, Dongkuan Xu, Wenchao Yu et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 888 citations
- Environment Inference for Invariant LearningElliot Creager, Jörn-Henrik Jacobsen, Richard S. ZemelICML 2021 · 454 citations
- ASAP: Adaptive Structure Aware Pooling for Learning Hierarchical Graph RepresentationsEkagra Ranjan, Soumya Sanyal, Partha P. TalukdarAAAI 2020 · 400 citations
Related papers
- Out-of-Distribution Generalization on Graphs via Progressive InferenceYiming Xu, Bin Shi, Zhen Peng, Huixiang Liu et al.AAAI 2025 · 4 citations
- Cooperative Classification and Rationalization for Graph GeneralizationLinan Yue, Qi Liu, Ye Liu, Weibo Gao et al.WWW 2024 · 15 citations
- Quantifying Distributional Invariance in Causal Subgraph for IRM-Free Graph GeneralizationYang Qiu, Yixiong Zou, Jun Wang, Wei Liu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Train Once and Explain Everywhere: Pre-training Interpretable Graph Neural NetworksJun Yin, Chaozhuo Li, Hao Yan, Jianxun Lian et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 16 citations
- D4Explainer: In-distribution Explanations of Graph Neural Network via Discrete Denoising DiffusionJialin Chen, Shirley Wu, Abhijit Gupta, Rex YingNeurIPS 2023 · 31 citations
