Grounding Language to Entities and Dynamics for Generalization in Reinforcement Learning
Austin W. Hanjie, Victor Zhong, Karthik Narasimhan
Abstract
We investigate the use of natural language to drive the generalization of control policies and introduce the new multi-task environment Messenger with free-form text manuals describing the environment dynamics. Unlike previous work, Messenger does not assume prior knowledge connecting text and state observations the control policy must simultaneously ground the game manual to entity symbols and dynamics in the environment. We develop a new model, EMMA (Entity Mapper with Multi-modal Attention) which uses an entity-conditioned attention module that allows for selective focus over relevant descriptions in the manual for each entity in the environment. EMMA is end-to-end differentiable and learns a latent grounding of entities and dynamics from text to observations using only environment rewards. EMMA achieves successful zero-shot generalization to unseen games with new dynamics, obtaining a 40% higher win rate compared to multiple baselines. However, win rate on the hardest stage of Messenger remains low (10%), demonstrating the need for additional work in this direction.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6489ef31-c3de-41c5-ae60-055aecc07f93Cited by top-tier papers18
- ProAgent: Building Proactive Cooperative Agents with Large Language ModelsCeyao Zhang, Kaijie Yang, Siyi Hu, Zihao Wang et al.AAAI 2024 · 141 citations
- SmartPlay : A Benchmark for LLMs as Intelligent AgentsYue Wu, Xuan Tang, Tom M. Mitchell, Yuanzhi LiICLR 2024 · 121 citations
- Do Embodied Agents Dream of Pixelated Sheep: Embodied Decision Making using Language Guided World ModellingKolby Nottingham, Prithviraj Ammanabrolu, Alane Suhr, Yejin Choi et al.ICML 2023 · 110 citations
- AutoGuide: Automated Generation and Selection of Context-Aware Guidelines for Large Language Model AgentsYao Fu, Dong-Ki Kim, Jaekyeom Kim, Sungryull Sohn et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 80 citations
- Learning to Model the World With LanguageJessy Lin, Yuqing Du, Olivia Watkins, Danijar Hafner et al.ICML 2024 · 76 citations
Builds on4
- The NetHack Learning EnvironmentHeinrich Küttler, Nantas Nardelli, Alexander H. Miller, Roberta Raileanu et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 251 citations
- Environmental drivers of systematicity and generalization in a situated agentFelix Hill, Andrew K. Lampinen, Rosalia Schneider, Stephen Clark et al.ICLR 2020 · 109 citations
- Grounded Language Learning Fast and SlowFelix Hill, Olivier Tieleman, Tamara von Glehn, Nathaniel Wong et al.ICLR 2021 · 85 citations
- RTFM: Generalising to New Environment Dynamics via ReadingVictor Zhong, Tim Rocktäschel, Edward GrefenstetteICLR 2020 · 44 citations
Related papers
- Entity Divider with Language Grounding in Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningZiluo Ding, Wanpeng Zhang, Junpeng Yue, Xiangjun Wang et al.ICML 2023 · 5 citations
- Improving Policy Learning via Language Dynamics DistillationVictor Zhong, Jesse Mu, Luke Zettlemoyer, Edward Grefenstette et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 16 citations
- Multitask Multimodal Prompted Training for Interactive Embodied Task CompletionGeorgios Pantazopoulos, Malvina Nikandrou, Amit Parekh, Bhathiya Hemanthage et al.EMNLP 2023 · 1 citation
- Conceptual Reinforcement Learning for Language-Conditioned TasksShaohui Peng, Xing Hu, Rui Zhang, Jiaming Guo et al.AAAI 2023 · 12 citations
- SILG: The Multi-domain Symbolic Interactive Language Grounding BenchmarkVictor Zhong, Austin W. Hanjie, Sida I. Wang, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 23 citations
