Improving Policy Learning via Language Dynamics Distillation
Victor Zhong, Jesse Mu, Luke Zettlemoyer, Edward Grefenstette, Tim Rocktäschel
Abstract
Recent work has shown that augmenting environments with language descriptions improves policy learning. However, for environments with complex language abstractions, learning how to ground language to observations is difficult due to sparse, delayed rewards. We propose Language Dynamics Distillation (LDD), which pretrains a model to predict environment dynamics given demonstrations with language descriptions, and then fine-tunes these language-aware pretrained representations via reinforcement learning (RL). In this way, the model is trained to both maximize expected reward and retain knowledge about how language relates to environment dynamics. On SILG, a benchmark of five tasks with language descriptions that evaluate distinct generalization challenges on unseen environments (NetHack, ALFWorld, RTFM, Messenger, and Touchdown), LDD outperforms tabula-rasa RL, VAE pretraining, and methods that learn from unlabeled demonstrations in inverse RL and reward shaping with pretrained experts. In our analyses, we show that language descriptions in demonstrations improve sample-efficiency and generalization across environments, and that dynamics modelling with expert demonstrations is more effective than with non-experts.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers7
- Learning to Model the World With LanguageJessy Lin, Yuqing Du, Olivia Watkins, Danijar Hafner et al.ICML 2024 · 76 citations
- Distilling Internet-Scale Vision-Language Models into Embodied AgentsTheodore R. Sumers, Kenneth Marino, Arun Ahuja, Rob Fergus et al.ICML 2023 · 36 citations
- Language Control Diffusion: Efficiently Scaling through Space, Time, and TasksEdwin Zhang, Yujie Lu, Shinda Huang, William Yang Wang et al.ICLR 2024 · 34 citations
- Semantic HELM: A Human-Readable Memory for Reinforcement LearningFabian Paischer, Thomas Adler, Markus Hofmarcher, Sepp HochreiterNeurIPS 2023 · 21 citations
- diff History for Neural Language AgentsUlyana Piterbarg, Lerrel Pinto, Rob FergusICML 2024 · 4 citations
Builds on8
- ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive LearningMohit Shridhar, Xingdi Yuan, Marc-Alexandre Côté, Yonatan Bisk et al.ICLR 2021 · 819 citations
- The NetHack Learning EnvironmentHeinrich Küttler, Nantas Nardelli, Alexander H. Miller, Roberta Raileanu et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 251 citations
- Room-Across-Room: Multilingual Vision-and-Language Navigation with Dense Spatiotemporal GroundingAlexander Ku, Peter Anderson, Roma Patel, Eugene Ie et al.EMNLP 2020 · 208 citations
- RIDE: Rewarding Impact-Driven Exploration for Procedurally-Generated EnvironmentsRoberta Raileanu, Tim RocktäschelICLR 2020 · 198 citations
- Semantic Exploration from Language Abstractions and Pretrained RepresentationsAllison C. Tam, Neil C. Rabinowitz, Andrew K. Lampinen, Nicholas A. Roy et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 85 citations
Related papers
- SILG: The Multi-domain Symbolic Interactive Language Grounding BenchmarkVictor Zhong, Austin W. Hanjie, Sida I. Wang, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 23 citations
- Bridging Environments and Language with Rendering Functions and Vision-Language ModelsThéo Cachet, Christopher R. Dance, Olivier SigaudICML 2024 · 1 citation
- Disentangled Robot Learning via Separate Forward and Inverse Dynamics PretrainingWenyao Zhang, Bozhou Zhang, Zekun Qi, Wenjun Zeng et al.ICLR 2026 · 18 citations
- Grounding Language to Entities and Dynamics for Generalization in Reinforcement LearningAustin W. Hanjie, Victor Zhong, Karthik NarasimhanICML 2021 · 60 citations
- Conceptual Reinforcement Learning for Language-Conditioned TasksShaohui Peng, Xing Hu, Rui Zhang, Jiaming Guo et al.AAAI 2023 · 12 citations
