Labeling Neural Representations with Inverse Recognition
Kirill Bykov, Laura Kopf, Shinichi Nakajima, Marius Kloft, Marina M.-C. Höhne
Abstract
Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) demonstrate remarkable capabilities in learning complex hierarchical data representations, but the nature of these representations remains largely unknown. Existing global explainability methods, such as Network Dissection, face limitations such as reliance on segmentation masks, lack of statistical significance testing, and high computational demands. We propose Inverse Recognition (INVERT), a scalable approach for connecting learned representations with human-understandable concepts by leveraging their capacity to discriminate between these concepts. In contrast to prior work, INVERT is capable of handling diverse types of neurons, exhibits less computational complexity, and does not rely on the availability of segmentation masks. Moreover, INVERT provides an interpretable metric assessing the alignment between the representation and its corresponding explanation and delivering a measure of statistical significance. We demonstrate the applicability of INVERT in various scenarios, including the identification of representations affected by spurious correlations, and the interpretation of the hierarchical structure of decision-making within the models.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6307eae4-b28d-426c-baa9-cb9ac2eeab1dCited by top-tier papers13
- CoSy: Evaluating Textual Explanations of NeuronsLaura Kopf, Philine Lou Bommer, Anna Hedström, Sebastian Lapuschkin et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 23 citations
- Linear Explanations for Individual NeuronsTuomas P. Oikarinen, Tsui-Wei WengICML 2024 · 18 citations
- Capturing Polysemanticity with PRISM: A Multi-Concept Feature Description FrameworkLaura Kopf, Nils Feldhus, Kirill Bykov, Philine Lou Bommer et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 12 citations
- LaVCa: LLM-assisted Visual Cortex CaptioningTakuya Matsuyama, Shinji Nishimoto, Yu TakagiICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- Manipulating Feature Visualizations with Gradient SlingshotsDilyara Bareeva, Marina M.-C. Höhne, Alexander Warnecke, Lukas Pirch et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 8 citations
Builds on14
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- FCOS: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Object DetectionZhi Tian, Chunhua Shen, Hao Chen, Tong HeICCV 2019 · 6,042 citations
- Compositional Explanations of NeuronsJesse Mu, Jacob AndreasNeurIPS 2020 · 229 citations
- Natural Language Descriptions of Deep Visual FeaturesEvan Hernandez, Sarah Schwettmann, David Bau, Teona Bagashvili et al.ICLR 2022 · 160 citations
- Emergent World Representations: Exploring a Sequence Model Trained on a Synthetic TaskKenneth Li, Aspen K. Hopkins, David Bau, Fernanda B. Viégas et al.ICLR 2023 · 60 citations
Related papers
- A Disentangling Invertible Interpretation Network for Explaining Latent RepresentationsPatrick Esser, Robin Rombach, Björn OmmerCVPR 2020
- Brain Dissection: fMRI-trained Networks Reveal Spatial Selectivity in the Processing of Natural ImagesGabriel Sarch, Michael J. Tarr, Katerina Fragkiadaki, Leila WehbeNeurIPS 2023 · 20 citations
- Interpreting Deep Neural Networks with Relative Sectional Propagation by Analyzing Comparative Gradients and Hostile ActivationsWoo-Jeoung Nam, Jaesik Choi, Seong-Whan LeeAAAI 2021 · 19 citations
- DISCOVER: Making Vision Networks Interpretable via Competition and DissectionKonstantinos P. Panousis, Sotirios ChatzisNeurIPS 2023 · 9 citations
- Comparing the Decision-Making Mechanisms by Transformers and CNNs via Explanation MethodsMingqi Jiang, Saeed Khorram, Fuxin LiCVPR 2024
