Linear Explanations for Individual Neurons
Tuomas P. Oikarinen, Tsui-Wei Weng
Abstract
In recent years many methods have been developed to understand the internal workings of neural networks, often by describing the function of individual neurons in the model. However, these methods typically only focus on explaining the very highest activations of a neuron. In this paper we show this is not sufficient, and that the highest activation range is only responsible for a very small percentage of the neuron's causal effect. In addition, inputs causing lower activations are often very different and can't be reliably predicted by only looking at high activations. We propose that neurons should instead be understood as a linear combination of concepts, and develop an efficient method for producing these linear explanations. In addition, we show how to automatically evaluate description quality using simulation, i.e. predicting neuron activations on unseen inputs in vision setting.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 368d277d-786b-48f7-b964-2fa94663ef85Cited by top-tier papers10
- Signal in the Noise: Polysemantic Interference Transfers and Predicts Cross-Model InfluenceBofan Gong, Shiyang Lai, James Evans, Dawn SongICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Constructing Interpretable Features from Compositional Neuron GroupsOr David Shafran, Atticus Geiger, Mor GevaACL 2026 · 4 citations
- What is Missing? Explaining Neurons Activated by Absent ConceptsRobin Hesse, Simone Schaub-Meyer, Janina Hesse, Bernt Schiele et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Beyond Top Activations: Efficient and Reliable Crowdsourced Evaluation of Automated InterpretabilityTuomas Oikarinen, Ge Yan, Akshay Kulkarni, Tsui-Wei WengCVPR 2026 · 1 citation
- FastCAV: Efficient Computation of Concept Activation Vectors for Explaining Deep Neural NetworksLaines Schmalwasser, Niklas Penzel, Joachim Denzler, Julia NieblingICML 2025
Builds on14
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-TrainingXiaohua Zhai, Basil Mustafa, Alexander Kolesnikov, Lucas BeyerICCV 2023 · 2,932 citations
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,072 citations
- Convolutions Die Hard: Open-Vocabulary Segmentation with Single Frozen Convolutional CLIPQihang Yu, Ju He, Xueqing Deng, Xiaohui Shen et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 285 citations
- Compositional Explanations of NeuronsJesse Mu, Jacob AndreasNeurIPS 2020 · 229 citations
Related papers
- CoSy: Evaluating Textual Explanations of NeuronsLaura Kopf, Philine Lou Bommer, Anna Hedström, Sebastian Lapuschkin et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 23 citations
- Select, Hypothesize and Verify: Towards Verified Neuron Concept InterpretationZeBin Ji, Yang Hu, Xiuli Bi, Bo Liu et al.CVPR 2026
- Towards a fuller understanding of neurons with Clustered Compositional ExplanationsBiagio La Rosa, Leilani Gilpin, Roberto CapobiancoNeurIPS 2023 · 17 citations
- Evaluating Neuron Explanations: A Unified Framework with Sanity ChecksTuomas P. Oikarinen, Ge Yan, Tsui-Wei WengICML 2025
- DISCOVER: Making Vision Networks Interpretable via Competition and DissectionKonstantinos P. Panousis, Sotirios ChatzisNeurIPS 2023 · 9 citations
