DISCOVER: Making Vision Networks Interpretable via Competition and Dissection
Konstantinos P. Panousis, Sotirios Chatzis
Abstract
Modern deep networks are highly complex and their inferential outcome very hard to interpret. This is a serious obstacle to their transparent deployment in safety-critical or bias-aware applications. This work contributes to post-hoc interpretability, and specifically Network Dissection. Our goal is to present a framework that makes it easier to discover the individual functionality of each neuron in a network trained on a vision task; discovery is performed in terms of textual description generation. To achieve this objective, we leverage: (i) recent advances in multimodal vision-text models and (ii) network layers founded upon the novel concept of stochastic local competition between linear units. In this setting, only a small subset of layer neurons are activated for a given input, leading to extremely high activation sparsity (as low as only ). Crucially, our proposed method infers (sparse) neuron activation patterns that enables the neurons to activate/specialize to inputs with specific characteristics, diversifying their individual functionality. This capacity of our method supercharges the potential of dissection processes: human understandable descriptions are generated only for the very few active neurons, thus facilitating the direct investigation of the network's decision process. As we experimentally show, our approach: (i) yields Vision Networks that retain or improve classification performance, and (ii) realizes a principled framework for text-based description and examination of the generated neuronal representations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers4
- Sparse Autoencoders Learn Monosemantic Features in Vision-Language ModelsMateusz Pach, Shyamgopal Karthik, Quentin Bouniot, Serge J. Belongie et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 79 citations
- Coarse-to-Fine Concept Bottleneck ModelsKonstantinos P. Panousis, Dino Ienco, Diego MarcosNeurIPS 2024 · 35 citations
- LG-CAV: Train Any Concept Activation Vector with Language GuidanceQihan Huang, Jie Song, Mengqi Xue, Haofei Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 12 citations
- Hierarchical Concept-based Interpretable ModelsOscar Hill, Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Mateja JamnikICLR 2026 · 3 citations
Builds on14
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentionHugo Touvron, Matthieu Cord, Matthijs Douze, Francisco Massa et al.ICML 2021 · 8,974 citations
- Concept Bottleneck ModelsPang Wei Koh, Thao Nguyen, Yew Siang Tang, Stephen Mussmann et al.ICML 2020 · 1,233 citations
Related papers
- Natural Language Descriptions of Deep Visual FeaturesEvan Hernandez, Sarah Schwettmann, David Bau, Teona Bagashvili et al.ICLR 2022 · 160 citations
- CLIP-Dissect: Automatic Description of Neuron Representations in Deep Vision NetworksTuomas P. Oikarinen, Tsui-Wei WengICLR 2023 · 9 citations
- Select, Hypothesize and Verify: Towards Verified Neuron Concept InterpretationZeBin Ji, Yang Hu, Xiuli Bi, Bo Liu et al.CVPR 2026
- Leveraging Sparse Linear Layers for Debuggable Deep NetworksEric Wong, Shibani Santurkar, Aleksander MadryICML 2021 · 101 citations
- Competing Mutual Information Constraints with Stochastic Competition-Based Activations for Learning Diversified RepresentationsKonstantinos P. Panousis, Anastasios Antoniadis, Sotirios ChatzisAAAI 2022 · 5 citations
