Coarse-to-Fine Concept Bottleneck Models
Konstantinos P. Panousis, Dino Ienco, Diego Marcos
Abstract
Deep learning algorithms have recently gained significant attention due to their impressive performance. However, their high complexity and un-interpretable mode of operation hinders their confident deployment in real-world safety-critical tasks. This work targets ante hoc interpretability, and specifically Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs). Our goal is to design a framework that admits a highly interpretable decision making process with respect to human understandable concepts, on two levels of granularity. To this end, we propose a novel two-level concept discovery formulation leveraging: (i) recent advances in vision-language models, and (ii) an innovative formulation for coarse-to-fine concept selection via data-driven and sparsity-inducing Bayesian arguments. Within this framework, concept information does not solely rely on the similarity between the whole image and general unstructured concepts; instead, we introduce the notion of concept hierarchy to uncover and exploit more granular concept information residing in patch-specific regions of the image scene. As we experimentally show, the proposed construction not only outperforms recent CBM approaches, but also yields a principled framework towards interpetability.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0add6ce5-73d4-4d04-8563-0dc693849a98Cited by top-tier papers14
- Stochastic Concept Bottleneck ModelsMoritz Vandenhirtz, Sonia Laguna, Ricards Marcinkevics, Julia E. VogtNeurIPS 2024 · 56 citations
- Object-Centric Concept-BottlenecksDavid Steinmann, Wolfgang Stammer, Antonia Wüst, Kristian KerstingNeurIPS 2025 · 12 citations
- An Analysis of Concept Bottleneck Models: Measuring, Understanding, and Mitigating the Impact of Noisy AnnotationsSeonghwan Park, Jueun Mun, Donghyun Oh, Namhoon LeeNeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
- SUB: Benchmarking CBM Generalization via Synthetic Attribute SubstitutionsJessica Bader, Leander Girrbach, Stephan Alaniz, Zeynep AkataICCV 2025 · 8 citations
- Disentangled Concepts Speak Louder Than Words: Explainable Video Action RecognitionJongseo Lee, Wooil Lee, Gyeong-Moon Park, Seong Tae Kim et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
Builds on12
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- Concept Bottleneck ModelsPang Wei Koh, Thao Nguyen, Yew Siang Tang, Stephen Mussmann et al.ICML 2020 · 1,233 citations
- RegionCLIP: Region-based Language-Image PretrainingYiwu Zhong, Jianwei Yang, Pengchuan Zhang, Chunyuan Li et al.CVPR 2022 · 481 citations
- Probabilistic Concept Bottleneck ModelsEunji Kim, Dahuin Jung, Sangha Park, Siwon Kim et al.ICML 2023 · 108 citations
Related papers
- Rounded or Streamlined Head? Bridging Concept Bottleneck Models and Attribute-Described Object PartsYang Liu, Jiajin Zhang, Yaojun Hu, Bingguang Hao et al.CVPR 2026
- There Was Never a Bottleneck in Concept Bottleneck ModelsAntonio Almudévar, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato, Alfonso OrtegaICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- VLG-CBM: Training Concept Bottleneck Models with Vision-Language GuidanceDivyansh Srivastava, Ge Yan, Lily WengNeurIPS 2024 · 87 citations
- Prototype-Grounded Concept Models for Verifiable Concept AlignmentStefano Colamonaco, David Debot, Pietro Barbiero, Giuseppe MarraICML 2026
- Explanation Bottleneck ModelsShin'ya Yamaguchi, Kosuke NishidaAAAI 2025 · 4 citations
