Interpreting Physics in Video World Models
Sonia Joseph, Quentin Garrido, Randall Balestriero, Matthew Kowal, Thomas Fel, Shahab Bakhtiari, Blake Richards, Michael Rabbat
Abstract
A long-standing question in physical reasoning is whether video-based models need to rely on factorized representations of physical variables in order to make physically accurate predictions, or whether they can implicitly represent such variables in a task-specific, distributed manner. While modern video world models achieve strong performance on intuitive physics benchmarks, it remains unclear which of these representational regimes they implement internally. Here, we present the first interpretability study to directly examine physical representations inside large-scale video encoders. Using layerwise probing, subspace geometry, patch-level decoding, and targeted attention ablations, we characterize where physical information becomes accessible and how it is organized within encoder-based video transformers.
Across architectures, we identify a sharp intermediate-depth transition-which we call the Physics Emergence Zone-at which physical variables become accessible. Physics-related representations peak shortly after this transition and degrade toward the output layers. Decomposing motion into explicit variables, we find that scalar quantities such as speed and acceleration are available from early layers onwards, whereas motion direction becomes accessible only at the Physics Emergence Zone. Notably, we find that direction is encoded through a high-dimensional population structure with circular geometry, requiring coordinated multi-feature intervention to control. These findings suggest that modern video models do not use factorized representations of physical variables like a classical physics engine. Instead, they use a distributed representation that is nonetheless sufficient for making physical predictions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 61dd63fe-809f-4982-bc1b-280ca46df163Builds on12
- Video Diffusion ModelsJonathan Ho, Tim Salimans, Alexey A. Gritsenko, William Chan et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,948 citations
- Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single DirectionAndy Arditi, Oscar Obeso, Aaquib Syed, Daniel Paleka et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 1,166 citations
- CLEVRER: Collision Events for Video Representation and ReasoningKexin Yi, Chuang Gan, Yunzhu Li, Pushmeet Kohli et al.ICLR 2020 · 584 citations
- Perception Encoder: The best visual embeddings are not at the output of the networkDaniel Bolya, Po-Yao Huang, Peize Sun, Jang Hyun Cho et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 359 citations
- Kubric: A scalable dataset generatorKlaus Greff, Francois Belletti, Lucas Beyer, Carl Doersch et al.CVPR 2022 · 183 citations
Related papers
- Understanding Video Transformers via Universal Concept DiscoveryMatthew Kowal, Achal Dave, Rares Ambrus, Adrien Gaidon et al.CVPR 2024
- PHANTOM: Physics-Infused Video Generation via Joint Modeling of Visual and Latent Physical DynamicsYing Shen, Jerry Xiong, Tianjiao Yu, Ismini LourentzouCVPR 2026 · 12 citations
- Linear Mechanisms for Spatiotemporal Reasoning in Vision Language ModelsRaphaela Kang, Hongqiao Chen, Georgia Gkioxari, Pietro PeronaICLR 2026 · 11 citations
- QUANTIPHY: A Quantitative Benchmark Evaluating Physical Reasoning Abilities of Vision-Language ModelsLi Puyin, Tiange Xiang, Ella Mao, Shirley Wei et al.CVPR 2026 · 23 citations
- Physics from Video: Identifiability of Time-Invariant Second-Order ODEs under Minimal Trajectory ConditionsYuanyuan Wang, Wenjie Wang, Kun Zhang, Mingming GongICML 2026
