QUANTIPHY: A Quantitative Benchmark Evaluating Physical Reasoning Abilities of Vision-Language Models
Li Puyin, Tiange Xiang, Ella Mao, Shirley Wei, Xinye Chen, Adnan Masood, Li Fei-Fei, Ehsan Adeli
Abstract
Understanding the physical world is essential for generalist AI agents. However, it remains unclear whether state-of-the-art vision perception models (e.g., large VLMs) can reason physical properties quantitatively. Existing evaluations are predominantly VQA-based and qualitative, offering limited insight into whether these models can infer the kinematic quantities of moving objects from video observations. To address this, we present QuantiPhy, the first benchmark designed to quantitatively measure a VLM's physical reasoning ability. Comprising more than 3.3K video-text instances with numerical ground truth, QuantiPhy evaluates a VLM's performance on estimating an object's size, velocity, and acceleration at a given timestamp, using one of these properties as an input prior. The benchmark standardizes prompts and scoring to assess numerical accuracy, enabling fair comparisons across models. Our experiments on state-of-the-art VLMs reveal a consistent gap between their qualitative plausibility and actual numerical correctness. We further provide an in-depth analysis of key factors like background noise, counterfactual priors, and strategic prompting and find that state-of-the-art VLMs lean heavily on pre-trained world knowledge rather than faithfully using the provided visual and textual inputs as references when reasoning kinematic properties quantitatively. QuantiPhy offers the first rigorous, scalable testbed to move VLMs beyond mere verbal plausibility toward a numerically grounded physical understanding.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8f11b63f-a68b-41ab-b09f-cc2964fef33fCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on15
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language ModelDanny Driess, Fei Xia, Mehdi S. M. Sajjadi, Corey Lynch et al.ICML 2023 · 2,601 citations
- Ego4D: Around the World in 3, 000 Hours of Egocentric VideoKristen Grauman, Andrew Westbury, Eugene Byrne, Zachary Chavis et al.CVPR 2022 · 525 citations
- FoundationPose: Unified 6D Pose Estimation and Tracking of Novel ObjectsBowen Wen, Wei Yang, Jan Kautz, Stan BirchfieldCVPR 2024 · 215 citations
- VideoPhy-2: A Challenging Action-Centric Physical Commonsense Evaluation in Video GenerationHritik Bansal, Clark Peng, Yonatan Bitton, Roman Goldenberg et al.ICLR 2026 · 146 citations
Related papers
- PAI-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark For Physical AIFengzhe Zhou, Jiannan Huang, Jialuo Li, Deva Ramanan et al.CVPR 2026 · 32 citations
- DeepPhy: Benchmarking Agentic VLMs on Physical ReasoningXinrun Xu, Pi Bu, Ye Wang, Börje F. Karlsson et al.AAAI 2026 · 6 citations
- PhysBench: Benchmarking and Enhancing Vision-Language Models for Physical World UnderstandingWei Chow, Jiageng Mao, Boyi Li, Daniel Seita et al.ICLR 2025 · 2 citations
- ContPhy: Continuum Physical Concept Learning and Reasoning from VideosZhicheng Zheng, Xin Yan, Zhenfang Chen, Jingzhou Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 22 citations
- VideoPhy: Evaluating Physical Commonsense for Video GenerationHritik Bansal, Zongyu Lin, Tianyi Xie, Zeshun Zong et al.ICLR 2025 · 1 citation
