Increasing the Cost of Model Extraction with Calibrated Proof of Work
Adam Dziedzic, Muhammad Ahmad Kaleem, Yu Shen Lu, Nicolas Papernot
Abstract
In model extraction attacks, adversaries can steal a machine learning model exposed via a public API by repeatedly querying it and adjusting their own model based on obtained predictions. To prevent model stealing, existing defenses focus on detecting malicious queries, truncating, or distorting outputs, thus necessarily introducing a tradeoff between robustness and model utility for legitimate users. Instead, we propose to impede model extraction by requiring users to complete a proof-of-work before they can read the model's predictions. This deters attackers by greatly increasing (even up to 100x) the computational effort needed to leverage query access for model extraction. Since we calibrate the effort required to complete the proof-of-work to each query, this only introduces a slight overhead for regular users (up to 2x). To achieve this, our calibration applies tools from differential privacy to measure the information revealed by a query. Our method requires no modification of the victim model and can be applied by machine learning practitioners to guard their publicly exposed models against being easily stolen.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 610bcfa3-09ba-4e42-9e9a-439c4bd20effCited by top-tier papers15
- Dataset Inference for Self-Supervised ModelsAdam Dziedzic, Haonan Duan, Muhammad Ahmad Kaleem, Nikita Dhawan et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 59 citations
- On the Difficulty of Defending Self-Supervised Learning against Model ExtractionAdam Dziedzic, Nikita Dhawan, Muhammad Ahmad Kaleem, Jonas Guan et al.ICML 2022 · 34 citations
- The False Promise of Imitating Proprietary Language ModelsArnav Gudibande, Eric Wallace, Charlie Snell, Xinyang Geng et al.ICLR 2024 · 30 citations
- ModelGuard: Information-Theoretic Defense Against Model Extraction AttacksMinxue Tang, Anna Dai, Louis DiValentin, Aolin Ding et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 28 citations
- Defending against Data-Free Model Extraction by Distributionally Robust Defensive TrainingZhenyi Wang, Li Shen, Tongliang Liu, Tiehang Duan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 26 citations
Builds on17
- Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIsFlorian Tramèr, Fan Zhang, Ari Juels, Michael K. Reiter et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 2,088 citations
- Turning Your Weakness Into a Strength: Watermarking Deep Neural Networks by BackdooringYossi Adi, Carsten Baum, Moustapha Cissé, Benny Pinkas et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 832 citations
- Entangled Watermarks as a Defense against Model ExtractionHengrui Jia, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Varun Chandrasekaran, Nicolas PapernotUSENIX Security 2021 · 287 citations
- Thieves on Sesame Street! Model Extraction of BERT-based APIsKalpesh Krishna, Gaurav Singh Tomar, Ankur P. Parikh, Nicolas Papernot et al.ICLR 2020 · 244 citations
- Prediction Poisoning: Towards Defenses Against DNN Model Stealing AttacksTribhuvanesh Orekondy, Bernt Schiele, Mario FritzICLR 2020 · 194 citations
Related papers
- How to Steer Your Adversary: Targeted and Efficient Model Stealing Defenses with Gradient RedirectionMantas Mazeika, Bo Li, David A. ForsythICML 2022 · 39 citations
- DAWN: Dynamic Adversarial Watermarking of Neural NetworksSebastian Szyller, Buse Gul Atli, Samuel Marchal, N. AsokanACM MM 2021 · 133 citations
- ActiveThief: Model Extraction Using Active Learning and Unannotated Public DataSoham Pal, Yash Gupta, Aditya Shukla, Aditya Kanade et al.AAAI 2020 · 164 citations
- Extracting Robust Models with Uncertain ExamplesGuanlin Li, Guowen Xu, Shangwei Guo, Han Qiu et al.ICLR 2023
- Exploring Connections Between Active Learning and Model ExtractionVarun Chandrasekaran, Kamalika Chaudhuri, Irene Giacomelli, Somesh Jha et al.USENIX Security 2020
