USENIX Security2020Top-tier venue
Exploring Connections Between Active Learning and Model Extraction
Varun Chandrasekaran, Kamalika Chaudhuri, Irene Giacomelli, Somesh Jha, Songbai Yan
Abstract
Machine learning is being increasingly used by individuals, research institutions, and corporations. This has resulted in the surge of Machine Learning-as-a-Service (MLaaS) - cloud services that provide (a) tools and resources to learn the model, and (b) a user-friendly query interface to access the model. However, such MLaaS systems raise privacy concerns such as model extraction. In model extraction attacks, adversaries maliciously exploit the query interface to steal the model. More precisely, in a model extraction attack, a good approximation of a sensitive or proprietary model held by the server is extracted (i.e. learned) by a dishonest user who interacts with the server only via the query interface. This attack was introduced by Tramer et al. at the 2016 USENIX Security Symposium, where practical attacks for various models were shown. We believe that better understanding the efficacy of model extraction attacks is paramount to designing secure MLaaS systems. To that end, we take the first step by (a) formalizing model extraction and discussing possible defense strategies, and (b) drawing parallels between model extraction and established area of active learning. In particular, we show that recent advancements in the active learning domain can be used to implement powerful model extraction attacks, and investigate possible defense strategies.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 122dd2a6-07e6-438a-8243-5d3ebc0ac11cCited by top-tier papers45
- Stealing Links from Graph Neural NetworksXinlei He, Jinyuan Jia, Michael Backes, Neil Zhenqiang Gong et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 226 citations
- Prediction Poisoning: Towards Defenses Against DNN Model Stealing AttacksTribhuvanesh Orekondy, Bernt Schiele, Mario FritzICLR 2020 · 194 citations
- ActiveThief: Model Extraction Using Active Learning and Unannotated Public DataSoham Pal, Yash Gupta, Aditya Shukla, Aditya Kanade et al.AAAI 2020 · 164 citations
- DeepSteal: Advanced Model Extractions Leveraging Efficient Weight Stealing in MemoriesAdnan Siraj Rakin, Md Hafizul Islam Chowdhuryy, Fan Yao, Deliang FanS&P 2022 · 163 citations
- Dataset Inference: Ownership Resolution in Machine LearningPratyush Maini, Mohammad Yaghini, Nicolas PapernotICLR 2021 · 155 citations
Builds on4
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIsFlorian Tramèr, Fan Zhang, Ari Juels, Michael K. Reiter et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 2,088 citations
- Stealing Hyperparameters in Machine LearningBinghui Wang, Neil Zhenqiang GongS&P 2018 · 504 citations
Related papers
- ModelGuard: Information-Theoretic Defense Against Model Extraction AttacksMinxue Tang, Anna Dai, Louis DiValentin, Aolin Ding et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 28 citations
- SAME: Sample Reconstruction against Model Extraction AttacksYi Xie, Jie Zhang, Shiqian Zhao, Tianwei Zhang et al.AAAI 2024 · 6 citations
- Extracting Robust Models with Uncertain ExamplesGuanlin Li, Guowen Xu, Shangwei Guo, Han Qiu et al.ICLR 2023
- CloudLeak: Large-Scale Deep Learning Models Stealing Through Adversarial ExamplesHonggang Yu, Kaichen Yang, Teng Zhang, Yun-Yun Tsai et al.NDSS 2020
- Practical and Efficient Model Extraction of Sentiment Analysis APIsWeibin Wu, Jianping Zhang, Victor Junqiu Wei, Xixian Chen et al.ICSE 2023 · 10 citations
