Defending against Data-Free Model Extraction by Distributionally Robust Defensive Training
Zhenyi Wang, Li Shen, Tongliang Liu, Tiehang Duan, Yanjun Zhu, Donglin Zhan, David S. Doermann, Mingchen Gao
Abstract
Data-Free Model Extraction (DFME) aims to clone a black-box model without knowing its original training data distribution, making it much easier for attackers to steal commercial models. Defense against DFME faces several challenges: (i) effectiveness; (ii) efficiency; (iii) no prior on the attacker’s query data distribution and strategy. However, existing defense methods: (1) are highly computation and memory inefficient; or (2) need strong assumptions about attack data distribution; or (3) can only delay the attack or prove a model theft after the model stealing has happened. In this work, we propose a Memory and Computation efficient defense approach, named MeCo, to prevent DFME from happening while maintaining the model utility simultaneously by distributionally robust defensive training on the target victim model. Specifically, we randomize the input so that it: (1) causes a mismatch of the knowledge distillation loss for attackers; (2) disturbs the zeroth-order gradient estimation; (3) changes the label prediction for the attack query data. Therefore, the attacker can only extract misleading information from the black-box model. Extensive experiments on defending against both decision-based and score-based DFME demonstrate that MeCo can significantly reduce the effectiveness of existing DFME methods and substantially improve running efficiency.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers12
- A Resilient and Accessible Distribution-Preserving Watermark for Large Language ModelsYihan Wu, Zhengmian Hu, Junfeng Guo, Hongyang Zhang et al.ICML 2024 · 50 citations
- Improving Non-Transferable Representation Learning by Harnessing Content and StyleZiming Hong, Zhenyi Wang, Li Shen, Yu Yao et al.ICLR 2024 · 37 citations
- Defense against Model Extraction Attack by Bayesian Active WatermarkingZhenyi Wang, Yihan Wu, Heng HuangICML 2024 · 10 citations
- Learning a Single Neuron Robustly to Distributional Shifts and Adversarial Label NoiseShuyao Li, Sushrut Karmalkar, Ilias Diakonikolas, Jelena DiakonikolasNeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations
- Drago: Primal-Dual Coupled Variance Reduction for Faster Distributionally Robust OptimizationRonak Mehta, Jelena Diakonikolas, Zaïd HarchaouiNeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations
Builds on29
- Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIsFlorian Tramèr, Fan Zhang, Ari Juels, Michael K. Reiter et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 2,088 citations
- Turning Your Weakness Into a Strength: Watermarking Deep Neural Networks by BackdooringYossi Adi, Carsten Baum, Moustapha Cissé, Benny Pinkas et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 832 citations
- Stealing Hyperparameters in Machine LearningBinghui Wang, Neil Zhenqiang GongS&P 2018 · 504 citations
- Entangled Watermarks as a Defense against Model ExtractionHengrui Jia, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Varun Chandrasekaran, Nicolas PapernotUSENIX Security 2021 · 287 citations
- Prediction Poisoning: Towards Defenses Against DNN Model Stealing AttacksTribhuvanesh Orekondy, Bernt Schiele, Mario FritzICLR 2020 · 194 citations
Related papers
- Protecting DNNs from Theft using an Ensemble of Diverse ModelsSanjay Kariyappa, Atul Prakash, Moinuddin K. QureshiICLR 2021 · 33 citations
- Data-Free Model ExtractionJean-Baptiste Truong, Pratyush Maini, Robert J. Walls, Nicolas PapernotCVPR 2021
- DisGUIDE: Disagreement-Guided Data-Free Model ExtractionJonathan Rosenthal, Eric Enouen, Hung Viet Pham, Lin TanAAAI 2023 · 31 citations
- Defending Against Model Stealing Attacks With Adaptive MisinformationSanjay Kariyappa, Moinuddin K. QureshiCVPR 2020
- Isolation and Induction: Training Robust Deep Neural Networks against Model Stealing AttacksJun Guo, Xingyu Zheng, Aishan Liu, Siyuan Liang et al.ACM MM 2023 · 8 citations
