DisGUIDE: Disagreement-Guided Data-Free Model Extraction
Jonathan Rosenthal, Eric Enouen, Hung Viet Pham, Lin Tan
Abstract
Recent model-extraction attacks on Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) systems have moved towards data-free approaches, showing the feasibility of stealing models trained with difficult-to-access data. However, these attacks are ineffective or limited due to the low accuracy of extracted models and the high number of queries to the models under attack. The high query cost makes such techniques infeasible for online MLaaS systems that charge per query.
We create a novel approach to get higher accuracy and query efficiency than prior data-free model extraction techniques. Specifically, we introduce a novel generator training scheme that maximizes the disagreement loss between two clone models that attempt to copy the model under attack. This loss, combined with diversity loss and experience replay, enables the generator to produce better instances to train the clone models. Our evaluation on popular datasets CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 shows that our approach improves the final model accuracy by up to 3.42% and 18.48% respectively. The average number of queries required to achieve the accuracy of the prior state of the art is reduced by up to 64.95%. We hope this will promote future work on feasible data-free model extraction and defenses against such attacks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0343d3ad-6db9-4ae2-8f12-3263c8fe0ea5Cited by top-tier papers4
- Unveiling the Secrets without Data: Can Graph Neural Networks Be Exploited through Data-Free Model Extraction Attacks?Yuanxin Zhuang, Chuan Shi, Mengmei Zhang, Jinghui Chen et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 11 citations
- KOEnsAttack: Towards Efficient Data-Free Black-Box Adversarial Attacks via Knowledge-Orthogonalized Substitute EnsemblesChaoyong Yang, Jia-Li Yin, Bin Chen, Zhaozhe Hu et al.ICCV 2025
- DeepTracer: Tracing Stolen Model via Deep Coupled WatermarksYunfei Yang, Xiaojun Chen, Yuexin Xuan, Zhendong Zhao et al.AAAI 2026
- CEGA: A Cost-Effective Approach for Graph-Based Model Extraction and AcquisitionZebin Wang, Menghan Lin, Bolin Shen, Ken Anderson et al.ICML 2025
Builds on11
- Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIsFlorian Tramèr, Fan Zhang, Ari Juels, Michael K. Reiter et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 2,088 citations
- Data-Free Learning of Student NetworksHanting Chen, Yunhe Wang, Chang Xu, Zhaohui Yang et al.ICCV 2019 · 427 citations
- Revisiting Fundamentals of Experience ReplayWilliam Fedus, Prajit Ramachandran, Rishabh Agarwal, Yoshua Bengio et al.ICML 2020 · 303 citations
- Problems and Opportunities in Training Deep Learning Software Systems: An Analysis of VarianceHung Viet Pham, Shangshu Qian, Jiannan Wang, Thibaud Lutellier et al.ASE 2020 · 91 citations
- Towards Data-Free Model Stealing in a Hard Label SettingSunandini Sanyal, Sravanti Addepalli, R. Venkatesh BabuCVPR 2022 · 76 citations
Related papers
- Data-Free Hard-Label Robustness Stealing AttackXiaojian Yuan, Kejiang Chen, Wen Huang, Jie Zhang et al.AAAI 2024 · 11 citations
- Exploring Query Efficient Data Generation Towards Data-Free Model Stealing in Hard Label SettingGaozheng Pei, Shaojie Lyu, Ke Ma, Pinci Yang et al.AAAI 2025 · 2 citations
- Exploring Connections Between Active Learning and Model ExtractionVarun Chandrasekaran, Kamalika Chaudhuri, Irene Giacomelli, Somesh Jha et al.USENIX Security 2020
- Dual Student Networks for Data-Free Model StealingJames Beetham, Navid Kardan, Ajmal Saeed Mian, Mubarak ShahICLR 2023 · 3 citations
- ModelGuard: Information-Theoretic Defense Against Model Extraction AttacksMinxue Tang, Anna Dai, Louis DiValentin, Aolin Ding et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 28 citations
