Quality Change: Norm or Exception? Measurement, Analysis and Detection of Quality Change in Wikipedia
Paramita Das, Bhanu Prakash Reddy Guda, Sasi Bhushan Seelaboyina, Soumya Sarkar, Animesh Mukherjee
Abstract
Wikipedia has been turned into an immensely popular crowd-sourced encyclopedia for information dissemination on numerous versatile topics in the form of subscription free content. It allows anyone to contribute so that the articles remain comprehensive and updated. For enrichment of content without compromising standards, the Wikipedia community enumerates a detailed set of guidelines, which should be followed. Based on these, articles are categorized into several quality classes by the Wikipedia editors with increasing adherence to guidelines. This quality assessment task by editors is laborious as well as demands platform expertise. As a first objective, in this paper, we study evolution of a Wikipedia article with respect to such quality scales. Our results show novel non-intuitive patterns emerging from this exploration. As a second objective we attempt to develop an automated data driven approach for the detection of the early signals influencing the quality change of articles. We posit this as a change point detection problem whereby we represent an article as a time series of consecutive revisions and encode every revision by a set of intuitive features. Finally, various change point detection algorithms are used to efficiently and accurately detect the future change points. We also perform various ablation studies to understand which group of features are most effective in identifying the change points. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that rigorously explores English Wikipedia article quality life cycle from the perspective of quality indicators and provides a novel unsupervised page level approach to detect quality switch, which can help in automatic content monitoring in Wikipedia thus contributing significantly to the CSCW community.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6078720b-c59b-440c-b434-942d6dae4c65Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on3
- ORES: Lowering Barriers with Participatory Machine Learning in WikipediaAaron Halfaker, R. Stuart GeigerCSCW 2020 · 84 citations
- Successful Online Socialization: Lessons from the Wikipedia Education ProgramAng Li, Zheng Yao, Diyi Yang, Chinmay Kulkarni et al.CSCW 2020 · 18 citations
- NwQM: A neural quality assessment framework for WikipediaBhanu Prakash Reddy Guda, Sasi Bhushan Seelaboyina, Soumya Sarkar, Animesh MukherjeeEMNLP 2020 · 7 citations
Related papers
- Automatically Labeling Low Quality Content on Wikipedia By Leveraging Patterns in Editing BehaviorsSumit Asthana, Sabrina Tobar Thommel, Aaron Lee Halfaker, Nikola BanovicCSCW 2021 · 9 citations
- WikiSQE: A Large-Scale Dataset for Sentence Quality Estimation in WikipediaKenichiro Ando, Satoshi Sekine, Mamoru KomachiAAAI 2024 · 5 citations
- Longitudinal Assessment of Reference Quality on WikipediaAitolkyn Baigutanova, Jaehyeon Myung, Diego Sáez-Trumper, Ai-Jou Chou et al.WWW 2023 · 14 citations
- An Open Multilingual System for Scoring Readability of WikipediaMykola Trokhymovych, Indira Sen, Martin GerlachACL 2024
- How Good is Your Wikipedia? Auditing Data Quality for Low-resource and Multilingual NLPKushal Tatariya, Artur Kulmizev, Wessel Poelman, Esther Ploeger et al.ACL 2026 · 2 citations
