Successful Online Socialization: Lessons from the Wikipedia Education Program
Ang Li, Zheng Yao, Diyi Yang, Chinmay Kulkarni, Rosta Farzan, Robert E. Kraut
Abstract
Attracting and retaining newcomers is critical and challenging for online production communities such as Wikipedia, both because volunteers need specialized training and are likely to leave before being integrated into the community. In response to these challenges, the Wikimedia Foundation started the Wiki Education Project (Wiki Ed), an online program in which college students edit Wikipedia articles as class assignments. The Wiki Ed program incorporates many components of institutional socialization, a process many conventional organizations successfully use to integrate new employees through formalized on-boarding practices. Research has not adequately investigated whether Wiki Ed and similar programs are effective ways to integrate volunteers in online communities, and, if so, the mechanisms involved. This paper evaluates the Wiki Ed program by comparing 16,819 student editors in 770 Wiki Ed classes with new editors who joined Wikipedia in the conventional way. The evaluation shows that the Wiki Ed students did more work, improved articles more, and were more committed to Wikipedia. For example, compared to new editors who joined Wikipedia in the conventional way they were twice as likely to still be editing Wikipedia a year after their Wiki Ed class was finished. Further, students in classrooms that encouraged joint activity, a key component of institutional socialization, produced better quality work than those in classrooms where students worked independently. These findings are consistent with an interpretation that the Wiki Ed program was successful because it incorporated elements of institutionalized socialization.
CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Human computer interaction (HCI).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4e96cfba-44d7-41a4-bfd2-97ba97fb437aCited by top-tier papers4
- Learning to Become a Volunteer Counselor: Lessons from a Peer-to-Peer Mental Health CommunityZheng Yao, Haiyi Zhu, Robert E. KrautCSCW 2022 · 17 citations
- Increasing Participation in Peer Production Communities with the Newcomer HomepageMorten Warncke-Wang, Rita Ho, Marshall Miller, Isaac JohnsonCSCW 2023 · 9 citations
- Quality Change: Norm or Exception? Measurement, Analysis and Detection of Quality Change in WikipediaParamita Das, Bhanu Prakash Reddy Guda, Sasi Bhushan Seelaboyina, Soumya Sarkar et al.CSCW 2022 · 8 citations
- Learning AI Auditing: A Case Study of Teenagers Auditing a Generative AI ModelLuis Morales-Navarro, Michelle A. Gan, Evelyn Yu, Lauren Vogelstein et al.CSCW 2025 · 6 citations
Related papers
- Machines in the Margins: A Systematic Review of Automated Content Generation for WikipediaNeal Reeves, Elena SimperlCSCW 2025
- LLMs in Wikipedia: Investigating How LLMs Impact Participation in Knowledge CommunitiesMoyan Zhou, Soobin Cho, Loren TerveenCSCW 2026
- Automatically Labeling Low Quality Content on Wikipedia By Leveraging Patterns in Editing BehaviorsSumit Asthana, Sabrina Tobar Thommel, Aaron Lee Halfaker, Nikola BanovicCSCW 2021 · 9 citations
- Wikipedia Edit-a-thons as Sites of Public PedagogyLaura March, Sayamindu DasguptaCSCW 2020 · 10 citations
- Unpacking Stitching between Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons: Barriers to Cross-Platform CollaborationYihan Yu, David W. McDonaldCSCW 2022 · 3 citations
