LLMs in Wikipedia: Investigating How LLMs Impact Participation in Knowledge Communities
Moyan Zhou, Soobin Cho, Loren Terveen
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are reshaping knowledge production as community members increasingly incorporate them into their contribution workflows. At the same time, participating in knowledge communities involves more than just contributing content - it is also a deeply social process shaped by members’ level of expertise. Although communities must carefully consider appropriate and responsible LLM integration, the absence of concrete norms has left individual editors to experiment and navigate LLM use on their own. Understanding how LLMs influence community participation across expertise levels is therefore critical in shaping future norms and supporting effective adoption. To address this gap, we investigated Wikipedia, one of the largest knowledge production communities, to understand participation in three dimensions: 1) how LLMs influence the ways editors gather knowledge, 2) how editors leverage strategies to align LLM outputs with community norms, and 3) how other editors in the community respond to LLM-assisted contributions. Through interviews with 16 Wikipedia editors with different levels of expertise who had used LLMs for their edits, we revealed a participation gap mediated by expertise in adopting LLMs across knowledge gathering, community norm alignment, and peer responses. Based on these findings, we challenge existing models of novice editors’ involvement and propose design implications for LLMs to support community engagement, highlighting opportunities for LLMs to sustain mentorship, knowledge transmission, and legitimacy building by scaffolding and feedback, process documentation, and LLM disclosure by good-faith novice editors.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on11
- CoAuthor: Designing a Human-AI Collaborative Writing Dataset for Exploring Language Model CapabilitiesMina Lee, Percy Liang, Qian YangCHI 2022 · 340 citations
- TaleBrush: Sketching Stories with Generative Pretrained Language ModelsJohn Joon Young Chung, Wooseok Kim, Kang Min Yoo, Hwaran Lee et al.CHI 2022 · 202 citations
- A Design Space for Intelligent and Interactive Writing AssistantsMina Lee, Katy Ilonka Gero, John Joon Young Chung, Simon Buckingham Shum et al.CHI 2024 · 133 citations
- Shaping Human-AI Collaboration: Varied Scaffolding Levels in Co-writing with Language ModelsParamveer S. Dhillon, Somayeh Molaei, Jiaqi Li, Maximilian Golub et al.CHI 2024 · 102 citations
- ORES: Lowering Barriers with Participatory Machine Learning in WikipediaAaron Halfaker, R. Stuart GeigerCSCW 2020 · 84 citations
Related papers
- LLM or Human? Perceptions of Trust and Quality in Research SummariesNil-Jana Akpinar, Sandeep Avula, Chia-Jung Lee, Brandon Dang et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Sanctioned by Others: Remediating Knowledge Exclusion on Wikipedia Through DesignLeah Ajmani, Moyan Zhou, Tanja Andic, Amber Berson et al.CSCW 2026
- Towards Insider Summarization for Mediation Instead of Moderation: Examining Wikipedian Views on Key Elements of Discussion SummariesSoobin Cho, Mark Zachry, David W. McDonaldCSCW 2025
- Current and Future Use of Large Language Models for Knowledge WorkMichelle Brachman, Amina H. El-Ashry, Casey Dugan, Werner GeyerCSCW 2025 · 10 citations
- 'I'm Categorizing LLM as a Productivity Tool': Examining Ethics of LLM Use in HCI Research PracticesShivani Kapania, Ruiyi Wang, Toby Jia-Jun Li, Tianshi Li et al.CSCW 2025 · 31 citations
