Boosting Open Set Recognition Performance through Modulated Representation Learning
Amit Kumar Kundu, Vaishnavi S Patil, Joseph JaJa
Abstract
The open set recognition (OSR) problem aims to identify test samples from novel semantic classes that are not part of the training classes, a task that is crucial in many practical scenarios. However, the existing OSR methods use a constant scaling factor (the temperature) to the logits before applying a loss function, which hinders the model from exploring both ends of the spectrum in representation learning -from instance-level to semantic-level features. In this paper, we address this problem by enabling temperature-modulated representation learning using a set of proposed temperature schedules, including our novel negative cosine schedule. Our temperature schedules allow the model to form a coarse decision boundary at the beginning of training by focusing on fewer neighbors, and gradually prioritizes more neighbors to smooth out the rough edges. This gradual task switching leads to a richer and more generalizable representation space. While other OSR methods benefit by including regularization or auxiliary negative samples, such as with mix-up, thereby adding a significant computational overhead, our schedules can be folded into any existing OSR loss function with no overhead. We implement the novel schedule on top of a number of baselines, using cross-entropy, contrastive and the ARPL loss functions and find that it boosts both the OSR and the closed set performance in most cases, especially on the tougher semantic shift benchmarks. Project codes will be available.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on18
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- Supervised Contrastive LearningPrannay Khosla, Piotr Teterwak, Chen Wang, Aaron Sarna et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 7,049 citations
- Open-Set Recognition: A Good Closed-Set Classifier is All You NeedSagar Vaze, Kai Han, Andrea Vedaldi, Andrew ZissermanICLR 2022 · 594 citations
- PMAL: Open Set Recognition via Robust Prototype MiningJing Lu, Yunlu Xu, Hao Li, Zhanzhan Cheng et al.AAAI 2022 · 76 citations
- OpenAUC: Towards AUC-Oriented Open-Set RecognitionZitai Wang, Qianqian Xu, Zhiyong Yang, Yuan He et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 55 citations
Related papers
- Contrastive Open Set RecognitionBaile Xu, Furao Shen, Jian ZhaoAAAI 2023 · 37 citations
- Temperature Schedules for self-supervised contrastive methods on long-tail dataAnna Kukleva, Moritz Böhle, Bernt Schiele, Hilde Kuehne et al.ICLR 2023 · 7 citations
- From Coarse to Fine-Grained Open-Set RecognitionNico Lang, Vésteinn Snæbjarnarson, Elijah Cole, Oisin Mac Aodha et al.CVPR 2024
- Prospective Representation Learning for Non-Exemplar Class-Incremental LearningWuxuan Shi, Mang YeNeurIPS 2024 · 9 citations
- CoHOZ: Contrastive Multimodal Prompt Tuning for Hierarchical Open-set Zero-shot RecognitionNing Liao, Yifeng Liu, Xiaobo Li, Chenyi Lei et al.ACM MM 2022 · 6 citations
