USENIX Security2020Top-tier venue
SAVIOR: Securing Autonomous Vehicles with Robust Physical Invariants
Raul Quinonez, Jairo Giraldo, Luis E. Salazar, Erick Bauman, Alvaro A. Cárdenas, Zhiqiang Lin
Abstract
Autonomous Vehicles (AVs), including aerial, sea, and ground vehicles, assess their environment with a variety of sensors and actuators that allow them to perform specific tasks such as navigating a route, hovering, or avoiding collisions. So far, AVs tend to trust the information provided by their sensors to make navigation decisions without data validation or verification, and therefore, attackers can exploit these limitations by feeding erroneous sensor data with the intention of disrupting or taking control of the system. In this paper we introduce SAVIOR: an architecture for securing autonomous vehicles with robust physical invariants. We implement and validate our proposal on two popular open-source controllers for aerial and ground vehicles, and demonstrate its effectiveness.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5ffd67ad-4f9c-4427-8e53-e75cc67405c9Cited by top-tier papers31
- Invisible for both Camera and LiDAR: Security of Multi-Sensor Fusion based Perception in Autonomous Driving Under Physical-World AttacksYulong Cao, Ningfei Wang, Chaowei Xiao, Dawei Yang et al.S&P 2021 · 309 citations
- Can We Use Arbitrary Objects to Attack LiDAR Perception in Autonomous Driving?Yi Zhu, Chenglin Miao, Tianhang Zheng, Foad Hajiaghajani et al.CCS 2021 · 65 citations
- M2MON: Building an MMIO-based Security Reference Monitor for Unmanned VehiclesArslan Khan, Hyungsub Kim, Byoungyoung Lee, Dongyan Xu et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 35 citations
- "Get in Researchers; We're Measuring Reproducibility": A Reproducibility Study of Machine Learning Papers in Tier 1 Security ConferencesDaniel Olszewski, Allison Lu, Carson Stillman, Kevin Warren et al.CCS 2023 · 19 citations
- InertiEAR: Automatic and Device-independent IMU-based Eavesdropping on SmartphonesMing Gao, Yajie Liu, Yike Chen, Yimin Li et al.INFOCOM 2022 · 18 citations
Builds on6
- Adversarial Sensor Attack on LiDAR-based Perception in Autonomous DrivingYulong Cao, Chaowei Xiao, Benjamin Cyr, Yimeng Zhou et al.CCS 2019 · 626 citations
- Limiting the Impact of Stealthy Attacks on Industrial Control SystemsDavid I. Urbina, Jairo Alonso Giraldo, Alvaro A. Cárdenas, Nils Ole Tippenhauer et al.CCS 2016 · 351 citations
- Detecting Attacks Against Robotic Vehicles: A Control Invariant ApproachHongjun Choi, Wen-Chuan Lee, Yousra Aafer, Fan Fei et al.CCS 2018 · 201 citations
- All Your GPS Are Belong To Us: Towards Stealthy Manipulation of Road Navigation SystemsKexiong Curtis Zeng, Shinan Liu, Yuanchao Shu, Dong Wang et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 174 citations
- Injected and Delivered: Fabricating Implicit Control over Actuation Systems by Spoofing Inertial SensorsYazhou Tu, Zhiqiang Lin, Insup Lee, Xiali HeiUSENIX Security 2018 · 132 citations
Related papers
- Cyber-Physical Inconsistency Vulnerability Identification for Safety Checks in Robotic VehiclesHongjun Choi, Sayali Kate, Yousra Aafer, Xiangyu Zhang et al.CCS 2020 · 22 citations
- Exploring Inherent Sensor Redundancy for Automotive Anomaly DetectionTianjia He, Lin Zhang, Fanxin Kong, Asif SalekinDAC 2020 · 44 citations
- PatchVerif: Discovering Faulty Patches in Robotic VehiclesHyungsub Kim, Muslum Ozgur Ozmen, Z. Berkay Celik, Antonio Bianchi et al.USENIX Security 2023
- SpecGuard: Specification Aware Recovery for Robotic Autonomous Vehicles from Physical AttacksPritam Dash, Ethan Chan, Karthik PattabiramanCCS 2024 · 8 citations
- RVFuzzer: Finding Input Validation Bugs in Robotic Vehicles through Control-Guided TestingTaegyu Kim, Chung Hwan Kim, Junghwan Rhee, Fan Fei et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 92 citations
