Connecting Neural Models Latent Geometries with Relative Geodesic Representations
Hanlin Yu, Berfin Inal, Georgios Arvanitidis, Søren Hauberg, Francesco Locatello, Marco Fumero
Abstract
Neural models learn representations of high-dimensional data on low-dimensional manifolds. Multiple factors, including stochasticities in the training process, model architectures, and additional inductive biases, may induce different representations, even when learning the same task on the same data. However, it has recently been shown that when a latent structure is shared between distinct latent spaces, relative distances between representations can be preserved, up to distortions. Building on this idea, we demonstrate that exploiting the differential-geometric structure of latent spaces of neural models, it is possible to capture precisely the transformations between representational spaces trained on similar data distributions. Specifically, we assume that distinct neural models parametrize approximately the same underlying manifold, and introduce a representation based on the pullback metric that captures the intrinsic structure of the latent space, while scaling efficiently to large models. We validate experimentally our method on model stitching and retrieval tasks, covering autoencoders and vision foundation discriminative models, across diverse architectures, datasets, pretraining schemes and modalities. Code is available at https://github.com/marc0git/RelativeGeodesics.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5e598b98-8124-4cb0-9f6e-0895e85637a9Cited by top-tier papers3
- Semantic Tube Prediction: Beating LLM Data Efficiency with JEPAHai Huang, Yann LeCun, Randall BalestrieroICML 2026 · 8 citations
- The Information Geometry of Softmax: Probing and SteeringKiho Park, Todd Nief, Yo Joong Choe, Victor VeitchICML 2026 · 6 citations
- Identifying Metric Structures of Deep Latent Variable ModelsStas Syrota, Yevgen Zainchkovskyy, Johnny Xi, Benjamin Bloem-Reddy et al.ICML 2025
Builds on24
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Revisiting Model Stitching to Compare Neural RepresentationsYamini Bansal, Preetum Nakkiran, Boaz BarakNeurIPS 2021 · 253 citations
- On Linear Identifiability of Learned RepresentationsGeoffrey Roeder, Luke Metz, Durk KingmaICML 2021 · 107 citations
- Similarity and Matching of Neural Network RepresentationsAdrián Csiszárik, Péter Korösi-Szabó, Ákos K. Matszangosz, Gergely Papp et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 105 citations
Related papers
- Relative representations enable zero-shot latent space communicationLuca Moschella, Valentino Maiorca, Marco Fumero, Antonio Norelli et al.ICLR 2023 · 7 citations
- From Bricks to Bridges: Product of Invariances to Enhance Latent Space CommunicationIrene Cannistraci, Luca Moschella, Marco Fumero, Valentino Maiorca et al.ICLR 2024 · 22 citations
- Latent Space Translation via Semantic AlignmentValentino Maiorca, Luca Moschella, Antonio Norelli, Marco Fumero et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 59 citations
- Functional Alignment Can Mislead: Examining Model StitchingDamian Smith, Harvey Mannering, Antonia MarcuICML 2025
- Latent Functional Maps: a spectral framework for representation alignmentMarco Fumero, Marco Pegoraro, Valentino Maiorca, Francesco Locatello et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations
