Semantic Tube Prediction: Beating LLM Data Efficiency with JEPA
Hai Huang, Yann LeCun, Randall Balestriero
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) obey consistent scaling laws-empirical power-law fits that predict how loss decreases with compute, data, and parameters. While predictive, these laws are descriptive rather than prescriptive: they characterize typical training, not optimal training. Surprisingly few works have successfully challenged the data-efficiency bounds implied by these laws-which is our primary focus. To that end, we introduce the Geodesic Hypothesis, positing that token sequences trace geodesics on a smooth semantic manifold and are therefore locally linear. Building on this principle, we propose a novel Semantic Tube Prediction (STP) task, a JEPA-style regularizer that confines hidden-state trajectories to a tubular neighborhood of the geodesic. STP generalizes JEPA to language without requiring explicit multi-view augmentations. We show this constraint improves signal-to-noise ratio, and consequently preserves diversity by preventing trajectory collisions during inference. Empirically, STP allows LLMs to match baseline accuracy with 16× less training data on the NL-RX-SYNTH dataset, directly violating the data term of Chinchilla-style scaling laws and demonstrating that principled geometric priors can surpass brute-force scaling. Code is available at https://github.com/ galilai-group/llm-jepa#stp .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9bbe5eb4-cefc-4773-aaca-2f8c5a3120b2Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on20
- data2vec: A General Framework for Self-supervised Learning in Speech, Vision and LanguageAlexei Baevski, Wei-Ning Hsu, Qiantong Xu, Arun Babu et al.ICML 2022 · 1,123 citations
- Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningBen Sorscher, Robert Geirhos, Shashank Shekhar, Surya Ganguli et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 720 citations
- Scaling Data-Constrained Language ModelsNiklas Muennighoff, Alexander M. Rush, Boaz Barak, Teven Le Scao et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 475 citations
- Understanding Dimensional Collapse in Contrastive Self-supervised LearningLi Jing, Pascal Vincent, Yann LeCun, Yuandong TianICLR 2022 · 467 citations
- The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language ModelsKiho Park, Yo Joong Choe, Victor VeitchICML 2024 · 461 citations
Related papers
- Language models scale reliably with over-training and on downstream tasksSamir Yitzhak Gadre, Georgios Smyrnis, Vaishaal Shankar, Suchin Gururangan et al.ICLR 2025 · 3 citations
- Scaling Inference-Efficient Language ModelsSong Bian, Minghao Yan, Shivaram VenkataramanICML 2025
- LLMs on the Line: Data Determines Loss-to-Loss Scaling LawsPrasanna Mayilvahanan, Thaddäus Wiedemer, Sayak Mallick, Matthias Bethge et al.ICML 2025
- Scaling Laws Revisited: Modeling the Role of Data Quality in Language Model PretrainingAnirudh Subramanyam, Yuxin Chen, Robert L. GrossmanICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- Beyond Chinchilla-Optimal: Accounting for Inference in Language Model Scaling LawsNikhil Sardana, Jacob P. Portes, Sasha Doubov, Jonathan FrankleICML 2024 · 144 citations
