Reflective AI: A Slow Technology Approach for Design Education
Vera van der Burg, Gijs de Boer, Jesse Josua Benjamin, Brett A. Halperin, Alkim Almila Akdag Salah, Senthil K. Chandrasegaran, Peter A. Lloyd
Abstract
The proliferation of efficiency-focused AI tools in creative processes threatens to undermine critical, reflective practices foundational to design education. This approach can lead to creativity exhaustion and diminished agency among designers and students. As an antidote, we propose Reflective AI: an approach grounded in slow technology principles that reframes AI not as a production tool, but as a medium for reflecting on the creative process itself. This paper presents the Objective Portrait Workshop where design students engaged in slowed data collection, annotation, and model finetuning. Our contribution is threefold: we (1) document a methodology for implementing Reflective AI in design education; (2) provide empirical evidence that slow engagement cultivates reflection on creative processes and technical understanding of AI; and (3) propose material and temporal disentanglement as core mechanisms for Reflective AI practice. This work offers a practical alternative to "fast"AI, providing methodology that cultivates critical capabilities essential to design.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5ce7a3c0-c17a-4832-bb37-330b6d51b490Builds on10
- Re-examining Whether, Why, and How Human-AI Interaction Is Uniquely Difficult to DesignQian Yang, Aaron Steinfeld, Carolyn P. Rosé, John ZimmermanCHI 2020 · 604 citations
- The Effects of Generative AI on Design Fixation and Divergent ThinkingSamangi Wadinambiarachchi, Ryan M. Kelly, Saumya Pareek, Qiushi Zhou et al.CHI 2024 · 186 citations
- User Experience Design Professionals' Perceptions of Generative Artificial IntelligenceJie Li, Hancheng Cao, Laura Lin, Youyang Hou et al.CHI 2024 · 149 citations
- Between Subjectivity and Imposition: Power Dynamics in Data Annotation for Computer VisionMilagros Miceli, Martin Schuessler, Tianling YangCSCW 2020 · 148 citations
- Machine Learning Uncertainty as a Design Material: A Post-Phenomenological InquiryJesse Josua Benjamin, Arne Berger, Nick Merrill, James PierceCHI 2021 · 125 citations
Related papers
- Understanding Nonlinear Collaboration between Human and AI Agents: A Co-design Framework for Creative DesignJiayi Zhou, Renzhong Li, Junxiu Tang, Tan Tang et al.CHI 2024 · 100 citations
- Catalyst for Creativity or a Hollow Trend?: A Cross-Level Perspective on The Role of Generative AI in DesignSyeda Masooma Naqvi, Ruichen He, Harmanpreet KaurCHI 2025 · 17 citations
- Creative Reflections on Image-Making with Artificial Intelligence: Interactions with a Provocative 'Camera'Rowan Page, Jian Shin SeeCHI 2025 · 6 citations
- Co-Constructed or Constrained? How AI Collaboration Tools Reshape UI Design Practice in a Time-Boxed Design ChallengeCharlotte Kobiella, Lukas Schneider, Albrecht Schmidt, Nada TerzimehicCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Sketching vs. AI Prompt Based Design Intent Evolution in Undergraduate Students: an Exploratory StudyVanessa Sattele, Juan Carlos OrtizCHI 2026 · 1 citation
