Lune

CHI2024Top-tier venue

Machine Learning Processes As Sources of Ambiguity: Insights from AI Art

Christian Sivertsen, Guido Salimbeni, Anders Sundnes Løvlie, Steven David Benford, Jichen Zhu

2024Year
40Citations
8Top-tier citations

Abstract

Ongoing efforts to turn Machine Learning (ML) into a design material have encountered limited success. This paper examines the burgeoning area of AI art to understand how artists incorporate ML in their creative work. Drawing upon related HCI theories, we investigate how artists create ambiguity by analyzing nine AI artworks that use computer vision and image synthesis. Our analysis shows that, in addition to the established types of ambiguity, artists worked closely with the ML process (dataset curation, model training, and application) and developed various techniques to evoke the ambiguity of processes. Our finding indicates that the current conceptualization of ML as a design material needs to reframe the ML process as design elements, instead of technical details. Finally, this paper offers reflections on commonly held assumptions in HCI about ML uncertainty, dependability, and explainability, and advocates to supplement the artifact-centered design perspective of ML with a process-centered one.

CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → HCI theory, concepts and models; • Applied computing → Media arts.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 5d84a625-cdeb-4d33-a5de-a81cf6da4702

Cited by top-tier papers8

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on12

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines