A Randomized Approach to Tight Privacy Accounting
Jiachen T. Wang, Saeed Mahloujifar, Tong Wu, Ruoxi Jia, Prateek Mittal
Abstract
Bounding privacy leakage over compositions, i.e., privacy accounting, is a key challenge in differential privacy (DP). However, the privacy parameter (ε or δ) is often easy to estimate but hard to bound. In this paper, we propose a new differential privacy paradigm called estimate-verify-release (EVR), which tackles the challenges of providing a strict upper bound for the privacy parameter in DP compositions by converting an estimate of privacy parameter into a formal guarantee. The EVR paradigm first verifies whether the mechanism meets the estimated privacy guarantee, and then releases the query output based on the verification result. The core component of the EVR is privacy verification. We develop a randomized privacy verifier using Monte Carlo (MC) technique. Furthermore, we propose an MC-based DP accountant that outperforms existing DP accounting techniques in terms of accuracy and efficiency. MC-based DP verifier and accountant is applicable to an important and commonly used class of DP algorithms, including the famous DP-SGD. An empirical evaluation shows the proposed EVR paradigm improves the utility-privacy tradeoff for privacy-preserving machine learning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5849a973-333f-428e-80d5-b008f3d2dd39Cited by top-tier papers3
- How Private are DP-SGD Implementations?Lynn Chua, Badih Ghazi, Pritish Kamath, Ravi Kumar et al.ICML 2024 · 25 citations
- Unified Mechanism-Specific Amplification by Subsampling and Group Privacy AmplificationJan Schuchardt, Mihail Stoian, Arthur Kosmala, Stephan GünnemannNeurIPS 2024 · 8 citations
- Mind the Gap: Mixtures of Gaussians in Approximate Differential PrivacyHuikang Liu, Aras Selvi, Wolfram WiesemannICML 2026
Builds on15
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- BEiT: BERT Pre-Training of Image TransformersHangbo Bao, Li Dong, Songhao Piao, Furu WeiICLR 2022 · 3,632 citations
- Scaling Vision TransformersXiaohua Zhai, Alexander Kolesnikov, Neil Houlsby, Lucas BeyerCVPR 2022 · 767 citations
- The Discrete Gaussian for Differential PrivacyClément L. Canonne, Gautam Kamath, Thomas SteinkeNeurIPS 2020 · 355 citations
- Auditing Differentially Private Machine Learning: How Private is Private SGD?Matthew Jagielski, Jonathan R. Ullman, Alina OpreaNeurIPS 2020 · 354 citations
Related papers
- The Saddle-Point Method in Differential PrivacyWael Alghamdi, Juan Felipe Gómez, Shahab Asoodeh, Flávio P. Calmon et al.ICML 2023 · 16 citations
- Efficient Public Verification of Private ML via RegularizationZoë R Bell, Anvith Thudi, Olive Franzese-McLaughlin, Nicolas Papernot et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Near-Exact Privacy Amplification for Matrix MechanismsChristopher A. Choquette-Choo, Arun Ganesh, Saminul Haque, Thomas Steinke et al.ICLR 2025
- Tight on Budget?: Tight Bounds for r-Fold Approximate Differential PrivacySebastian Meiser, Esfandiar MohammadiCCS 2018 · 61 citations
- General-Purpose f-DP Estimation and Auditing in a Black-Box SettingÖnder Askin, Holger Dette, Martin Dunsche, Tim Kutta et al.USENIX Security 2025
