Large Language Models are Versatile Decomposers: Decomposing Evidence and Questions for Table-based Reasoning
Yunhu Ye, Binyuan Hui, Min Yang, Binhua Li, Fei Huang, Yongbin Li
Abstract
Table-based reasoning has shown remarkable progress in a wide range of table-based tasks. It is a challenging task, which requires reasoning over both free-form natural language (NL) questions and (semi-)structured tabular data. However, previous table-based reasoning solutions usually suffer from significant performance degradation on ''huge'' evidence (tables). In addition, most existing methods struggle to reason over complex questions since the essential information is scattered in different places. To alleviate the above challenges, we exploit large language models (LLMs) as decomposers for effective table-based reasoning, which (i) decompose huge evidence (a huge table) into sub-evidence (a small table) to mitigate the interference of useless information for table reasoning, and (ii) decompose a complex question into simpler sub-questions for text reasoning. First, we use a powerful LLM to decompose the evidence involved in the current question into the sub-evidence that retains the relevant information and excludes the remaining irrelevant information from the ''huge'' evidence. Second, we propose a novel ''parsing-execution-filling'' strategy to decompose a complex question into simper step-by-step sub-questions by generating intermediate SQL queries as a bridge to produce numerical and logical sub-questions with a powerful LLM. Finally, we leverage the decomposed sub-evidence and sub-questions to get the final answer with a few in-context prompting examples. Extensive experiments on three benchmark datasets (TabFact, WikiTableQuestion, and FetaQA) demonstrate that our method achieves significantly better results than competitive baselines for table-based reasoning. Notably, our method outperforms human performance for the first time on the TabFact dataset. In addition to impressive overall performance, our method also has the advantage of interpretability, where the returned results are to some extent tractable with the generated sub-evidence and sub-questions. For reproducibility, we release our source code and data at: https://github.com/AlibabaResearch/DAMO-ConvAI.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 583d8dd4-010a-49c2-ab7c-17e3f803975fCited by top-tier papers54
- TableRAG: Million-Token Table Understanding with Language ModelsSi-An Chen, Lesly Miculicich, Julian Eisenschlos, Zifeng Wang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 86 citations
- Decompose, Analyze and Rethink: Solving Intricate Problems with Human-like Reasoning CycleShangzi Xue, Zhenya Huang, Jiayu Liu, Xin Lin et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 55 citations
- OpenTab: Advancing Large Language Models as Open-domain Table ReasonersKezhi Kong, Jiani Zhang, Zhengyuan Shen, Balasubramaniam Srinivasan et al.ICLR 2024 · 40 citations
- DocLLM: A Layout-Aware Generative Language Model for Multimodal Document UnderstandingDongsheng Wang, Natraj Raman, Mathieu Sibue, Zhiqiang Ma et al.ACL 2024 · 37 citations
- Navigate through Enigmatic Labyrinth A Survey of Chain of Thought Reasoning: Advances, Frontiers and FutureZheng Chu, Jingchang Chen, Qianglong Chen, Weijiang Yu et al.ACL 2024 · 36 citations
Builds on25
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language ModelsAitor Lewkowycz, Anders Andreassen, David Dohan, Ethan Dyer et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,039 citations
- Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied AgentsWenlong Huang, Pieter Abbeel, Deepak Pathak, Igor MordatchICML 2022 · 1,539 citations
Related papers
- Chain-of-Table: Evolving Tables in the Reasoning Chain for Table UnderstandingZilong Wang, Hao Zhang, Chun-Liang Li, Julian Martin Eisenschlos et al.ICLR 2024 · 244 citations
- AixelAsk: A Stepwise-Guided Retrieval and Reasoning Framework for Large Table QAChi Zhang, Meihui Zhang, Yuxin Yang, Tao Chen et al.SIGMOD 2026 · 2 citations
- Weaver: Interweaving SQL and LLM for Table ReasoningRohit Khoja, Devanshu Gupta, Yanjie Fu, Dan Roth et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- Syllogism-Inspired TableQA: Evidentialization Makes Decomposition Reasoning and Answer Verification More ReliableZhe Zhang, Lili Bai, Chaopeng Guo, Jie SongAAAI 2026
- CRT-QA: A Dataset of Complex Reasoning Question Answering over Tabular DataZhehao Zhang, Xitao Li, Yan Gao, Jian-Guang LouEMNLP 2023 · 3 citations
