Learning Decentralized LLM Collaboration with Multi-Agent Actor Critic
Shuo Liu, Tianle Chen, Ryan Amiri, Christopher Amato
Abstract
Recent work has explored optimizing LLM collaboration through Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL). However, most MARL finetuning approaches rely on predefined execution protocols, which often require centralized execution. Decentralized LLM collaboration is more appealing in practice, as agents can run inference in parallel with flexible deployments. Also, current approaches use Monte Carlo methods for fine-tuning, which suffer from high variance and thus require more samples to train effectively. Actor-critic methods are prevalent in MARL for dealing with these issues; thus, we developed Multi-Agent Actor-Critic (MAAC) methods to optimize decentralized LLM collaboration. In this paper, we analyze when and why these MAAC methods are beneficial. We propose 2 MAAC approaches, CoLLM-CC with a Centralized Critic and CoLLM-DC with Decentralized Critics. Our experiments across writing, coding, and game-playing domains show that Monte Carlo methods and CoLLM-DC can achieve performance comparable to CoLLM-CC in short-horizon and dense-reward settings. However, they both underperform CoLLM-CC on long-horizon or sparse-reward tasks, where Monte Carlo methods require substantially more samples and CoLLM-DC struggles to converge. Our code is available at https://github.com/ OpenMLRL/CoMLRL/releases/tag/v1.3.6 .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 53baee67-84d0-4e53-81cf-15a4acd63d37Builds on18
- Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent DebateYilun Du, Shuang Li, Antonio Torralba, Joshua B. Tenenbaum et al.ICML 2024 · 1,562 citations
- QPLEX: Duplex Dueling Multi-Agent Q-LearningJianhao Wang, Zhizhou Ren, Terry Liu, Yang Yu et al.ICLR 2021 · 595 citations
- Multi-LLM Debate: Framework, Principals, and InterventionsAndrew Estornell, Yang LiuNeurIPS 2024 · 131 citations
- AgentNet: Decentralized Evolutionary Coordination for LLM-based Multi-Agent SystemsYingxuan Yang, Huacan Chai, Shuai Shao, Yuanyi Song et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 104 citations
- MultiAgentBench : Evaluating the Collaboration and Competition of LLM agentsKunlun Zhu, Hongyi Du, Zhaochen Hong, Xiaocheng Yang et al.ACL 2025 · 97 citations
Related papers
- LLM Collaboration with Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningShuo Liu, Zeyu Liang, Xueguang Lyu, Christopher AmatoAAAI 2026
- Finite-Time Global Optimality Convergence in Deep Neural Actor-Critic Methods for Decentralized Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningZhiyao Zhang, Myeung Suk Oh, Hairi, Ziyue Luo et al.ICML 2025
- Agent-Centric Actor-Critic for Asynchronous Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningWhiyoung Jung, Sunghoon Hong, Deunsol Yoon, Kanghoon Lee et al.ICML 2025
- ACC-Collab: An Actor-Critic Approach to Multi-Agent LLM CollaborationAndrew Estornell, Jean-Francois Ton, Yuanshun Yao, Yang LiuICLR 2025 · 1 citation
- More Centralized Training, Still Decentralized Execution: Multi-Agent Conditional Policy FactorizationJiangxing Wang, Deheng Ye, Zongqing LuICLR 2023 · 5 citations
