Holdout-Loss-Based Data Selection for LLM Finetuning via In-Context Learning
Ling Zhang, Xianliang Yang, Juwon Yu, Park Cheonyoung, Lei Song, Jiang Bian
Abstract
Fine-tuning large pretrained language models is a common approach for aligning them with human preferences, but noisy or off-target examples can dilute supervision. While small, well-chosen datasets often match the performance of much larger ones, systematic and efficient ways to identify high-value training data remain underexplored. Many current methods rely on heuristics or expensive retraining. We present a principled, resource-efficient framework for data selection and reweighting. At its core is an In-Context Approximation (ICA) that estimates the holdout loss a model would incur after training on a candidate example by conditioning on a small, curated holdout set in context. ICA requires no reference model and no additional finetuning. We define the resulting estimate as the ICA score, and derive per-example weights that dynamically reweight gradient updates as model parameters evolve. Across SFT, DPO, and SimPO, and over diverse backbones and datasets, ICA-based reweighting consistently improves model alignment with minimal overhead. We analyze sensitivity to score update frequency and the number of in-context holdout examples. We also discuss limitations in rapidly drifting on-policy settings, highlighting directions for future work. Code and prompts will be released.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 500a9765-e985-4efd-bd5b-926029fdb52dBuilds on27
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
- SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free RewardYu Meng, Mengzhou Xia, Danqi ChenNeurIPS 2024 · 1,203 citations
Related papers
- A Deep Dive into the Trade-Offs of Parameter-Efficient Preference Alignment TechniquesMegh Thakkar, Quentin Fournier, Matthew Riemer, Pin-Yu Chen et al.ACL 2024
- Model Extrapolation Expedites AlignmentChujie Zheng, Ziqi Wang, Heng Ji, Minlie Huang et al.ACL 2025 · 34 citations
- Alignment-Aware DecodingFrédéric Berdoz, Luca Lanzendörfer, René Caky, Roger WattenhoferICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Preference-Oriented Supervised Fine-Tuning: Favoring Target Model over Aligned Large Language ModelsYuchen Fan, Yuzhong Hong, Qiushi Wang, Junwei Bao et al.AAAI 2025 · 7 citations
- Dynamic Rewarding with Prompt Optimization Enables Tuning-free Self-Alignment of Language ModelsSomanshu Singla, Zhen Wang, Tianyang Liu, Abdullah Ashfaq et al.EMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
