Model Extrapolation Expedites Alignment
Chujie Zheng, Ziqi Wang, Heng Ji, Minlie Huang, Nanyun Peng
Abstract
Given the high computational cost of preference alignment training of large language models (LLMs), exploring efficient methods to reduce the training overhead remains an important and compelling research problem. Motivated by the observation that alignment training typically involves only small parameter changes without injecting new knowledge into models, we propose a straightforward method called ExPO (model extrapolation) to expedite LLMs' alignment with human preferences. Given a partially-trained model and its initial SFT checkpoint, ExPO improves the implicit optimization objective of alignment training by simply amplifying the parameter change based on a first-order approximation, without any additional training overhead. Through controlled experiments, we demonstrate that ExPO boosts a DPO model trained with only 20% steps to outperform the fully-trained one. Moreover, we show that ExPO notably improves existing open-source LLMs (ranging from 1.8B to 70B parameters) on the leading AlpacaEval 2.0 and MT-Bench benchmarks, which highlights ExPO's broader utility in efficiently enhancing LLM alignment.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2a5dff54-28ce-4a90-bf71-db612ffeceb7Cited by top-tier papers6
- Adaptive Batch-Wise Sample Scheduling for Direct Preference OptimizationZixuan Huang, Yikun Ban, Lean Fu, Xiaojie Li et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 14 citations
- Optimizing Diversity and Quality through Base-Aligned Model CollaborationYichen Wang, Chenghao Yang, Tenghao Huang, Muhao Chen et al.ICML 2026 · 7 citations
- Enhancing Large Language Model Performance with Gradient-Based Parameter SelectionHaoling Li, Xin Zhang, Xiao Liu, Yeyun Gong et al.AAAI 2025
- Synergistic Weak-Strong Collaboration by Aligning PreferencesYizhu Jiao, Xuchao Zhang, Zhaoyang Wang, Yubo Ma et al.ACL 2025
- Efficient Model Development through Fine-tuning TransferPin-Jie Lin, Rishab Balasubramanian, Fengyuan Liu, Nikhil Kandpal et al.EMNLP 2025
Builds on18
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
Related papers
- DiffPO: Diffusion-styled Preference Optimization for Inference Time Alignment of Large Language ModelsRuizhe Chen, Wenhao Chai, Zhifei Yang, Xiaotian Zhang et al.ACL 2025
- SimPER: A Minimalist Approach to Preference Alignment without HyperparametersTeng Xiao, Yige Yuan, Zhengyu Chen, Mingxiao Li et al.ICLR 2025
- Explicit Preference Optimization: No Need for an Implicit Reward ModelXiangkun Hu, Lemin Kong, Tong He, David WipfICML 2025
- Earlier Tokens Contribute More: Learning Direct Preference Optimization From Temporal Decay PerspectiveRuichen Shao, Bei Li, Gangao Liu, Yang Chen et al.ICLR 2025
- AlphaDPO: Adaptive Reward Margin for Direct Preference OptimizationJunkang Wu, Xue Wang, Zhengyi Yang, Jiancan Wu et al.ICML 2025
