Retro*: Optimizing LLMs for Reasoning-Intensive Document Retrieval
Junwei Lan, Jianlyu Chen, Zheng Liu, Chaofan Li, Siqi Bao, Defu Lian
Abstract
With the growing popularity of LLM agents and RAG, it has become increasingly important to retrieve documents that are essential for solving a task, even when their connection to the task is indirect or implicit. Addressing this problem requires fine-grained reasoning to accurately assess the relevance between the task and each candidate document. This capability, however, poses a significant challenge for existing IR techniques. Despite recent progress in reasoning-enhanced IR, existing approaches still face significant challenges in applicability, scalability, and efficiency. In this work, we propose Retro*, a novel approach for reasoning-intensive document retrieval. Our method introduces a rubric-based relevance scoring mechanism, enabling the model to reason about the relationship between a task and a document based on explicitly defined criteria, whereby producing a fine-grained, interpretable relevance score. Retro* also supports test-time scaling by combining multiple reasoning trajectories via score integration, which produces more reliable relevance estimates. To optimize Retro*'s reasoning capabilities, we introduce a novel reinforcement learning algorithm tailored for its relevance scoring mechanism, which employs two composite rewards to fully exploit the trajectories of each training sample. Our experiments show that Retro* outperforms existing document retrieval methods with notable advantages, leading to state-of-the-art performance on the BRIGHT benchmark.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- ReasonEmbed: Enhanced Text Embeddings for Reasoning-Intensive Document RetrievalJianlyu Chen, Junwei Lan, Chaofan Li, Defu Lian et al.ACL 2026 · 13 citations
- RAG without Forgetting: Continual Query-Infused Key MemoryYuntong Hu, Sha Li, Naren Ramakrishnan, Liang ZhaoICML 2026
Builds on11
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- SGLang: Efficient Execution of Structured Language Model ProgramsLianmin Zheng, Liangsheng Yin, Zhiqiang Xie, Chuyue Sun et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 1,586 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
Related papers
- DynamicRAG: Leveraging Outputs of Large Language Model as Feedback for Dynamic Reranking in Retrieval-Augmented GenerationJiashuo Sun, Xianrui Zhong, Sizhe Zhou, Jiawei HanNeurIPS 2025 · 19 citations
- Optimizing Retrieval for RAG via Reinforcement LearningJiawei Zhou, Lei ChenNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- A Survey of Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval: Progress and ChallengesYiyang Wei, Tingyu Song, Siyue Zhang, Yilun ZhaoACL 2026
- Process vs. Outcome Reward: Which is Better for Agentic RAG Reinforcement LearningWenlin Zhang, Xiangyang Li, Kuicai Dong, Yichao Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 85 citations
- MMRAG-RFT: Two-stage Reinforcement Fine-tuning for Explainable Multi-modal Retrieval-augmented GenerationShengwei Zhao, Jingwen Yao, Sitong Wei, Linhai Xu et al.AAAI 2026
