Weisfeiler-Lehman Meets Gromov-Wasserstein
Samantha Chen, Sunhyuk Lim, Facundo Mémoli, Zhengchao Wan, Yusu Wang
Abstract
The Weisfeiler-Lehman (WL) test is a classical procedure for graph isomorphism testing. The WL test has also been widely used both for designing graph kernels and for analyzing graph neural networks. In this paper, we propose the Weisfeiler-Lehman (WL) distance, a notion of distance between labeled measure Markov chains (LMMCs), of which labeled graphs are special cases. The WL distance is polynomial time computable and is also compatible with the WL test in the sense that the former is positive if and only if the WL test can distinguish the two involved graphs. The WL distance captures and compares subtle structures of the underlying LMMCs and, as a consequence of this, it is more discriminating than the distance between graphs used for defining the state-of-the-art Wasserstein Weisfeiler-Lehman graph kernel. Inspired by the structure of the WL distance we identify a neural network architecture on LMMCs which turns out to be universal w.r.t. continuous functions defined on the space of all LMMCs (which includes all graphs) endowed with the WL distance. Finally, the WL distance turns out to be stable w.r.t. a natural variant of the Gromov-Wasserstein (GW) distance for comparing metric Markov chains that we identify. Hence, the WL distance can also be construed as a polynomial time lower bound for the GW distance which is in general NP-hard to compute.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4d6eb77a-2661-4e33-8aa6-6d91c6953e0bCited by top-tier papers12
- Fine-grained Expressivity of Graph Neural NetworksJan Böker, Ron Levie, Ningyuan Huang, Soledad Villar et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 34 citations
- Comparing Graph Transformers via Positional EncodingsMitchell Black, Zhengchao Wan, Gal Mishne, Amir Nayyeri et al.ICML 2024 · 27 citations
- Graph Classification via Reference Distribution Learning: Theory and PracticeZixiao Wang, Jicong FanNeurIPS 2024 · 18 citations
- MMD Graph Kernel: Effective Metric Learning for Graphs via Maximum Mean DiscrepancyYan Sun, Jicong FanICLR 2024 · 17 citations
- Bisimulation Metrics are Optimal Transport Distances, and Can be Computed EfficientlySergio Calo, Anders Jonsson, Gergely Neu, Ludovic Schwartz et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 9 citations
Builds on4
- The Unbalanced Gromov Wasserstein Distance: Conic Formulation and RelaxationThibault Séjourné, François-Xavier Vialard, Gabriel PeyréNeurIPS 2021 · 106 citations
- CO-Optimal TransportTitouan Vayer, Ievgen Redko, Rémi Flamary, Nicolas CourtyNeurIPS 2020 · 86 citations
- Linear-Time Gromov Wasserstein Distances using Low Rank Couplings and CostsMeyer Scetbon, Gabriel Peyré, Marco CuturiICML 2022 · 73 citations
- Expressive Power of Invariant and Equivariant Graph Neural NetworksWaïss Azizian, Marc LelargeICLR 2021 · 22 citations
Related papers
- Wasserstein Graph Distance Based on L1-Approximated Tree Edit Distance between Weisfeiler-Lehman SubtreesZhongxi Fang, Jianming Huang, Xun Su, Hiroyuki KasaiAAAI 2023 · 8 citations
- Three Iterations of (d - 1)-WL Test Distinguish Non Isometric Clouds of d-dimensional PointsValentino Delle Rose, Alexander Kozachinskiy, Cristobal Rojas, Mircea Petrache et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 14 citations
- On the Power of the Weisfeiler-Leman Test for Graph Motif ParametersMatthias Lanzinger, Pablo BarcelóICLR 2024 · 11 citations
- Weisfeiler-Leman at the margin: When more expressivity mattersBilly Joe Franks, Christopher Morris, Ameya Velingker, Floris GeertsICML 2024 · 15 citations
- 𝒩-WL: A New Hierarchy of Expressivity for Graph Neural NetworksQing Wang, Dillon Ze Chen, Asiri Wijesinghe, Shouheng Li et al.ICLR 2023
