The Unbalanced Gromov Wasserstein Distance: Conic Formulation and Relaxation
Thibault Séjourné, François-Xavier Vialard, Gabriel Peyré
Abstract
Comparing metric measure spaces (i.e. a metric space endowed with a probability distribution) is at the heart of many machine learning problems. The most popular distance between such metric measure spaces is the Gromov-Wasserstein (GW) distance, which is the solution of a quadratic assignment problem. The GW distance is however limited to the comparison of metric measure spaces endowed with a probability distribution. To alleviate this issue, we introduce two Unbalanced Gromov-Wasserstein formulations: a distance and a more tractable upper-bounding relaxation. They both allow the comparison of metric spaces equipped with arbitrary positive measures up to isometries. The first formulation is a positive and definite divergence based on a relaxation of the mass conservation constraint using a novel type of quadratically-homogeneous divergence. This divergence works hand in hand with the entropic regularization approach which is popular to solve large scale optimal transport problems. We show that the underlying non-convex optimization problem can be efficiently tackled using a highly parallelizable and GPU-friendly iterative scheme. The second formulation is a distance between mm-spaces up to isometries based on a conic lifting. Lastly, we provide numerical experiments on synthetic examples and domain adaptation data with a Positive-Unlabeled learning task to highlight the salient features of the unbalanced divergence and its potential applications in ML.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1b880a61-2b59-42d0-b168-9ad173e7233eCited by top-tier papers27
- Accurate Point Cloud Registration with Robust Optimal TransportZhengyang Shen, Jean Feydy, Peirong Liu, Ariel Hernán Curiale et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 81 citations
- Aligning individual brains with fused unbalanced Gromov WassersteinAlexis Thual, Quang Huy Tran, Tatiana Zemskova, Nicolas Courty et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 61 citations
- On Robust Optimal Transport: Computational Complexity and Barycenter ComputationKhang Le, Huy Nguyen, Quang Minh Nguyen, Tung Pham et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 48 citations
- GENOT: Entropic (Gromov) Wasserstein Flow Matching with Applications to Single-Cell GenomicsDominik Klein, Théo Uscidda, Fabian J. Theis, Marco CuturiNeurIPS 2024 · 34 citations
- Entropic Gromov-Wasserstein between Gaussian DistributionsKhang Le, Dung Q. Le, Huy Nguyen, Dat Do et al.ICML 2022 · 21 citations
Builds on3
- Robust Optimal Transport with Applications in Generative Modeling and Domain AdaptationYogesh Balaji, Rama Chellappa, Soheil FeiziNeurIPS 2020 · 141 citations
- On Unbalanced Optimal Transport: An Analysis of Sinkhorn AlgorithmKhiem Pham, Khang Le, Nhat Ho, Tung Pham et al.ICML 2020 · 104 citations
- Learning Autoencoders with Relational RegularizationHongteng Xu, Dixin Luo, Ricardo Henao, Svati Shah et al.ICML 2020 · 47 citations
Related papers
- Partial Optimal Tranport with applications on Positive-Unlabeled LearningLaetitia Chapel, Mokhtar Z. Alaya, Gilles GassoNeurIPS 2020 · 30 citations
- Partial Gromov-Wasserstein MetricYikun Bai, Rocio Diaz Martin, Abihith Kothapalli, Hengrong Du et al.ICLR 2025
- Joint Metric Space Embedding by Unbalanced Optimal Transport with Gromov-Wasserstein Marginal PenalizationFlorian Beier, Moritz Piening, Robert Beinert, Gabriele SteidlICML 2025
- Unbalanced Low-rank Optimal Transport SolversMeyer Scetbon, Michal Klein, Giovanni Palla, Marco CuturiNeurIPS 2023 · 13 citations
- Semi-relaxed Gromov-Wasserstein divergence and applications on graphsCédric Vincent-Cuaz, Rémi Flamary, Marco Corneli, Titouan Vayer et al.ICLR 2022 · 18 citations
