GENOT: Entropic (Gromov) Wasserstein Flow Matching with Applications to Single-Cell Genomics
Dominik Klein, Théo Uscidda, Fabian J. Theis, Marco Cuturi
Abstract
Single-cell genomics has significantly advanced our understanding of cellular behavior, catalyzing innovations in treatments and precision medicine. However, single-cell sequencing technologies are inherently destructive and can only measure a limited array of data modalities simultaneously. This limitation underscores the need for new methods capable of realigning cells. Optimal transport (OT) has emerged as a potent solution, but traditional discrete solvers are hampered by scalability, privacy, and out-of-sample estimation issues. These challenges have spurred the development of neural network-based solvers, known as neural OT solvers, that parameterize OT maps. Yet, these models often lack the flexibility needed for broader life science applications. To address these deficiencies, our approach learns stochastic maps (i.e. transport plans), allows for any cost function, relaxes mass conservation constraints and integrates quadratic solvers to tackle the complex challenges posed by the (Fused) Gromov-Wasserstein problem. Utilizing flow matching as a backbone, our method offers a flexible and effective framework. We demonstrate its versatility and robustness through applications in cell development studies, cellular drug response modeling, and cross-modality cell translation, illustrating significant potential for enhancing therapeutic strategies.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f522f859-e03e-4e47-b368-38d381703b53Cited by top-tier papers15
- Joint Velocity-Growth Flow Matching for Single-Cell Dynamics ModelingDongyi Wang, Yuanwei Jiang, Zhenyi Zhang, Xiang Gu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 30 citations
- Modeling Microenvironment Trajectories on Spatial Transcriptomics with NicheFlowKristiyan Sakalyan, Alessandro Palma, Filippo Guerranti, Fabian J. Theis et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 13 citations
- WFR-FM: Simulation-Free Dynamic Unbalanced Optimal TransportQiangwei Peng, Zihan Wang, Junda Ying, Yuhao Sun et al.ICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- Learning of Population Dynamics: Inverse Optimization Meets JKO SchemeMikhail Persiianov, Jiawei Chen, Petr Mokrov, Alexander Tyurin et al.ICLR 2026 · 7 citations
- Branched Schrödinger Bridge MatchingSophia Tang, Yinuo Zhang, Alexander Tong, Pranam ChatterjeeICLR 2026 · 6 citations
Builds on23
- Diffusion Schrödinger Bridge with Applications to Score-Based Generative ModelingValentin De Bortoli, James Thornton, Jeremy Heng, Arnaud DoucetNeurIPS 2021 · 811 citations
- TrajectoryNet: A Dynamic Optimal Transport Network for Modeling Cellular DynamicsAlexander Tong, Jessie Huang, Guy Wolf, David van Dijk et al.ICML 2020 · 257 citations
- Multisample Flow Matching: Straightening Flows with Minibatch CouplingsAram-Alexandre Pooladian, Heli Ben-Hamu, Carles Domingo-Enrich, Brandon Amos et al.ICML 2023 · 243 citations
- Denoising Diffusion Bridge ModelsLinqi Zhou, Aaron Lou, Samar Khanna, Stefano ErmonICLR 2024 · 163 citations
- Neural Optimal TransportAlexander Korotin, Daniil Selikhanovych, Evgeny BurnaevICLR 2023 · 151 citations
Related papers
- Unbalancedness in Neural Monge Maps Improves Unpaired Domain TranslationLuca Eyring, Dominik Klein, Théo Uscidda, Giovanni Palla et al.ICLR 2024 · 30 citations
- Departures: Distributional Transport for Single-Cell Perturbation Prediction with Neural Schrödinger BridgesChangxi Chi, Yufei Huang, Jun Xia, Jiangbin Zheng et al.AAAI 2026
- WFR-MFM: One-Step Inference for Dynamic Unbalanced Optimal TransportXinyu Wang, Ruoyu Wang, Qiangwei Peng, Peijie Zhou et al.ICML 2026 · 3 citations
- Supervised Training of Conditional Monge MapsCharlotte Bunne, Andreas Krause, Marco CuturiNeurIPS 2022 · 95 citations
- Unbalanced Low-rank Optimal Transport SolversMeyer Scetbon, Michal Klein, Giovanni Palla, Marco CuturiNeurIPS 2023 · 13 citations
