On the Power of the Weisfeiler-Leman Test for Graph Motif Parameters
Matthias Lanzinger, Pablo Barceló
Abstract
Seminal research in the field of graph neural networks (GNNs) has revealed a direct correspondence between the expressive capabilities of GNNs and the kdimensional Weisfeiler-Leman (kWL) test, a widely-recognized method for verifying graph isomorphism. This connection has reignited interest in comprehending the specific graph properties effectively distinguishable by the kWL test. A central focus of research in this field revolves around determining the least dimensionality k, for which kWL can discern graphs with different number of occurrences of a pattern graph P . We refer to such a least k as the WL-dimension of this pattern counting problem. This inquiry traditionally delves into two distinct counting problems related to patterns: subgraph counting and induced subgraph counting. Intriguingly, despite their initial appearance as separate challenges with seemingly divergent approaches, both of these problems are interconnected components of a more comprehensive problem: "graph motif parameters". In this paper, we provide a precise characterization of the WL-dimension of labeled graph motif parameters. As specific instances of this result, we obtain characterizations of the WL-dimension of the subgraph counting and induced subgraph counting problem for every labeled pattern P . Particularly noteworthy is our resolution of a problem left open in previous work concerning induced copies. We additionally demonstrate that in cases where the kWL test distinguishes between graphs with varying occurrences of a pattern P , the exact number of occurrences of P can be computed uniformly using only local information of the last layer of a corresponding GNN. We finally delve into the challenge of recognizing the WLdimension of various graph parameters. We give a polynomial time algorithm for determining the WL-dimension of the subgraph counting problem for given pattern P , answering an open question from previous work. We additionally show how to utilize deep results from the field of graph motif parameters, together with our characterization, to determine the WL-dimension of induced subgraph counting and counting k-graphlets.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext dc0cc64b-05e8-43e1-be54-4df6c492bf00Cited by top-tier papers5
- Homomorphism Counts for Graph Neural Networks: All About That BasisEmily Jin, Michael M. Bronstein, Ismail Ilkan Ceylan, Matthias LanzingerICML 2024 · 23 citations
- Counting Small Induced Subgraphs: Hardness via Fourier AnalysisRadu Curticapean, Daniel NeuenSODA 2025 · 1 citation
- Towards Bridging Generalization and Expressivity of Graph Neural NetworksShouheng Li, Floris Geerts, Dongwoo Kim, Qing WangICLR 2025
- Message Passing on the Edge: Towards Scalable and Expressive GNNsPablo Barcelo, Fabian Jogl, Alexander Kozachinskiy, Matthias Lanzinger et al.ICML 2026
- Homomorphism Counts as Structural Encodings for Graph LearningLinus Bao, Emily Jin, Michael M. Bronstein, Ismail Ilkan Ceylan et al.ICLR 2025
Builds on7
- Neural Bellman-Ford Networks: A General Graph Neural Network Framework for Link PredictionZhaocheng Zhu, Zuobai Zhang, Louis-Pascal A. C. Xhonneux, Jian TangNeurIPS 2021 · 546 citations
- A Fair Comparison of Graph Neural Networks for Graph ClassificationFederico Errica, Marco Podda, Davide Bacciu, Alessio MicheliICLR 2020 · 508 citations
- Inductive Relation Prediction by Subgraph ReasoningKomal K. Teru, Etienne G. Denis, William L. HamiltonICML 2020 · 493 citations
- Can Graph Neural Networks Count Substructures?Zhengdao Chen, Lei Chen, Soledad Villar, Joan BrunaNeurIPS 2020 · 392 citations
- Weisfeiler and Leman go sparse: Towards scalable higher-order graph embeddingsChristopher Morris, Gaurav Rattan, Petra MutzelNeurIPS 2020 · 190 citations
Related papers
- WL meet VCChristopher Morris, Floris Geerts, Jan Tönshoff, Martin GroheICML 2023 · 36 citations
- 𝒩-WL: A New Hierarchy of Expressivity for Graph Neural NetworksQing Wang, Dillon Ze Chen, Asiri Wijesinghe, Shouheng Li et al.ICLR 2023
- Graph Neural Networks with Local Graph ParametersPablo Barceló, Floris Geerts, Juan L. Reutter, Maksimilian RyschkovNeurIPS 2021 · 81 citations
- Three Iterations of (d - 1)-WL Test Distinguish Non Isometric Clouds of d-dimensional PointsValentino Delle Rose, Alexander Kozachinskiy, Cristobal Rojas, Mircea Petrache et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 14 citations
- A Complete Expressiveness Hierarchy for Subgraph GNNs via Subgraph Weisfeiler-Lehman TestsBohang Zhang, Guhao Feng, Yiheng Du, Di He et al.ICML 2023 · 84 citations
