Principal-Agent Reward Shaping in MDPs
Omer Ben-Porat, Yishay Mansour, Michal Moshkovitz, Boaz Taitler
Abstract
Principal-agent problems arise when one party acts on behalf of another, leading to conflicts of interest. The economic literature has extensively studied principal-agent problems, and recent work has extended this to more complex scenarios such as Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). In this paper, we further explore this line of research by investigating how reward shaping under budget constraints can improve the principal's utility. We study a two-player Stackelberg game where the principal and the agent have different reward functions, and the agent chooses an MDP policy for both players. The principal offers an additional reward to the agent, and the agent picks their policy selfishly to maximize their reward, which is the sum of the original and the offered reward. Our results establish the NP-hardness of the problem and offer polynomial approximation algorithms for two classes of instances: Stochastic trees and deterministic decision processes with a finite horizon.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4a49d2fd-9728-4a50-9e31-42d2e5b1e234Cited by top-tier papers12
- Contracting with a Learning AgentGuru Guruganesh, Yoav Kolumbus, Jon Schneider, Inbal Talgam-Cohen et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 38 citations
- Contextual Bilevel Reinforcement Learning for Incentive AlignmentVinzenz Thoma, Barna Pásztor, Andreas Krause, Giorgia Ramponi et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 21 citations
- Incentivized Learning in Principal-Agent Bandit GamesAntoine Scheid, Daniil Tiapkin, Etienne Boursier, Aymeric Capitaine et al.ICML 2024 · 17 citations
- Learning to Mitigate Externalities: the Coase Theorem with Hindsight RationalityAntoine Scheid, Aymeric Capitaine, Etienne Boursier, Eric Moulines et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations
- Reward Shaping for (Inference-Time) Alignment: A Stackelberg Game PerspectiveHaichuan Wang, Tao Lin, Lingkai Kong, Ce Li et al.ICML 2026 · 3 citations
Builds on11
- Learning to Utilize Shaping Rewards: A New Approach of Reward ShapingYujing Hu, Weixun Wang, Hangtian Jia, Yixiang Wang et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 256 citations
- Scalable Methods for Computing State Similarity in Deterministic Markov Decision ProcessesPablo Samuel CastroAAAI 2020 · 171 citations
- Policy Teaching via Environment Poisoning: Training-time Adversarial Attacks against Reinforcement LearningAmin Rakhsha, Goran Radanovic, Rati Devidze, Xiaojin Zhu et al.ICML 2020 · 145 citations
- Consequences of Misaligned AISimon Zhuang, Dylan Hadfield-MenellNeurIPS 2020 · 120 citations
- The Complexity of ContractsPaul Dütting, Tim Roughgarden, Inbal Talgam-CohenSODA 2020 · 26 citations
Related papers
- Contract Design Under Approximate Best ResponsesFrancesco Bacchiocchi, Jiarui Gan, Matteo Castiglioni, Alberto Marchesi et al.ICML 2025
- Polynomial-Time Approximation Schemes via Utility Alignment: Unit-Demand Pricing and MoreRobin Bowers, Marius Garbea, Emmanouil Pountourakis, Samuel TaggartFOCS 2025 · 1 citation
- Learning in Online Principal-Agent Interactions: The Power of MenusMinbiao Han, Michael Albert, Haifeng XuAAAI 2024 · 9 citations
- Stackelberg Learning with Outcome-based PaymentTom Yan, Chicheng ZhangNeurIPS 2025
- Planning with Participation ConstraintsHanrui Zhang, Yu Cheng, Vincent ConitzerAAAI 2022 · 4 citations
