Non-uniformity and Quantum Advice in the Quantum Random Oracle Model
Qipeng Liu
Abstract
In the quantum random oracle model (QROM) introduced by Boneh et al. (Asiacrypt 2011), a hash function is modeled as a uniformly random oracle, and a quantum algorithm can only interact with the hash function in a black-box manner. QRO methodology captures all generic algorithms. However, they fail to describe non-uniform quantum algorithms with preprocessing power, which receives a piece of bounded classical or quantum advice.
As non-uniform algorithms are largely believed to be the right model for attackers, starting from the work by Nayebi, Aaronson, Belovs, and Trevisan (QIC 2015), a line of works investigates non-uniform security in the random oracle model. Chung, Guo, Liu, and Qian (FOCS 2020) provide a framework and establish non-uniform security for many cryptographic applications. Although they achieve nearly optimal bounds for many applications with classical advice, their bounds for quantum advice are far from tight.
In this work, we continue the study on quantum advice in the QROM. We provide a new idea that generalizes the previous multi-instance framework, which we believe is more quantumfriendly and should be the quantum analog of multi-instance games. To this end, we match the bounds with quantum advice to those with classical advice by Chung et al., showing quantum advice is almost as good/bad as classical advice for many natural security games in the QROM. More formally, โข OWFs: Even with ๐-qubits of quantum advice, a ๐ -query quantum algorithm has advantage ๐((๐๐ + ๐ 2 )/๐ ) to invert a random function with domain and range size ๐ . As shown by Corrigan-Gibbs and Kogan (TCC 2019), any further improvement will lead to new classical circuit lower bounds. โข PRGs: An ๐-qubit, ๐ -query quantum algorithm can distinguish between a random image and a random element in the range, with an winning probability at most 1/2 + ๐(๐ 2 /๐ ) 1/2 + ๐(๐๐ /๐ ) 1/3 , in contrast to 1/2 + ๐((๐ 5 ๐ + ๐ 4 ๐ 2 )/๐ ) 1/19 by Chung et al. โข Salting: A commonly used mechanism in cryptography called salting defeats preprocessing, even with quantum advice, improved the bounds by Chung et al.
Finally, we show that for some contrived games in the QROM, quantum advice can be exponentially better than classical advice for some parameter regimes. To our best knowledge, it provides the first evidence of a general separation between quantum and classical advice relative to an unstructured oracle.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers7
- Verifiable Quantum Advantage without StructureTakashi Yamakawa, Mark ZhandryFOCS 2022 ยท 35 citations
- A One-Query Lower Bound for Unitary Synthesis and Breaking Quantum CryptographyAlex Lombardi, Fermi Ma, John WrightSTOC 2024 ยท 14 citations
- Unconditionally Secure Quantum Commitments with PreprocessingLuowen QianCRYPTO 2024 ยท 9 citations
- Unconditionally Secure Commitments with Quantum Auxiliary InputsTomoyuki Morimae, Barak Nehoran, Takashi YamakawaCRYPTO 2024 ยท 7 citations
- Tight Quantum Time-Space Tradeoffs for Permutation InversionAkshima, Tyler Besselman, Kai-Min Chung, Siyao Guo et al.EUROCRYPT 2026
Builds on6
- Hidden Cosets and Applications to Unclonable CryptographyAndrea Coladangelo, Jiahui Liu, Qipeng Liu, Mark ZhandryCRYPTO 2021 ยท 64 citations
- New Approaches for Quantum Copy-ProtectionScott Aaronson, Jiahui Liu, Qipeng Liu, Mark Zhandry et al.CRYPTO 2021 ยท 47 citations
- Tight Quantum Time-Space Tradeoffs for Function InversionKai-Min Chung, Siyao Guo, Qipeng Liu, Luowen QianFOCS 2020 ยท 39 citations
- Verifiable Quantum Advantage without StructureTakashi Yamakawa, Mark ZhandryFOCS 2022 ยท 35 citations
- Post-Quantum Succinct Arguments: Breaking the Quantum Rewinding BarrierAlessandro Chiesa, Fermi Ma, Nicholas Spooner, Mark ZhandryFOCS 2021 ยท 30 citations
Related papers
- Tight Characterizations for Preprocessing Against Cryptographic SaltingFangqi Dong, Qipeng Liu, Kewen WuCRYPTO 2024 ยท 2 citations
- Classical vs Quantum Random OraclesTakashi Yamakawa, Mark ZhandryEUROCRYPT 2021 ยท 43 citations
- How to Simulate Random Oracles with Auxiliary InputYevgeniy Dodis, Aayush Jain, Huijia Lin, Ji Luo et al.FOCS 2024
- A New Framework for Quantum Oblivious TransferAmit Agarwal, James Bartusek, Dakshita Khurana, Nishant KumarEUROCRYPT 2023 ยท 11 citations
- On the Impossibility of Key Agreements from Quantum Random OraclesPer Austrin, Hao Chung, Kai-Min Chung, Shiuan Fu et al.CRYPTO 2022 ยท 20 citations
