Lune

EUROCRYPT2026Top-tier venue

Tight Quantum Time-Space Tradeoffs for Permutation Inversion

Akshima, Tyler Besselman, Kai-Min Chung, Siyao Guo, Tzu-Yi Yang

2026Year

Abstract

In permutation inversion, we are given a permutation π : [N ] → [N ], and want to prepare some advice of size S, such that we can efficiently invert any image in time T . This is a fundamental cryptographic problem with profound connections to communication complexity and circuit lower bounds.

In the classical setting, a tight ST = Θ(N ) bound has been established since the seminal work of Hellman (1980) and Yao (1990). In the quantum setting, a lower bound of ST 2 = Ω(N ) is proved by Nayebi, Aaronson, Belovs, and Trevisan ( 2015) against classical advice, and by Hhan, Xagawa and Yamakawa (2019) against quantum advice. It left open an intriguing possibility that Grover's search can be sped up to time Õ( N/S).

In this work, we prove an ST + T 2 = Ω(N ) lower bound for permutation inversion with even quantum advice. This bound matches the best known attacks and shows that Grover's search and the classical Hellman's algorithm cannot be further sped up.

Our proof combines recent techniques by Liu (2023) and by Rosmanis (2022). Specifically, we first reduce the permutation inversion problem against quantum advice to a variant by Liu's technique, then we analyze this variant via representation theory inspired by Rosmanis (2022).

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 36faf973-9e14-4b34-8654-1ebd805b7b53

Builds on4

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines