Learning to Interpret Weight Differences in Language Models
Avichal Goel, Yoon Kim, Nir N Shavit, Tony T. Wang
Abstract
Finetuning (pretrained) language models is a standard approach for updating their internal parametric knowledge and specializing them to new tasks and domains. However, the corresponding model weight changes ("weight diffs") are not generally interpretable. While inspecting the finetuning dataset can give a sense of how the model might have changed, these datasets are often not publicly available or are too large to work with directly. Towards the goal of broadly understanding model weight changes in natural language, we introduce Diff Interpretation Tuning (DIT), a method that trains models to describe their own finetuning-induced modifications. Our approach uses synthetic, labeled weight diffs to train an introspection adapter, which can be applied to a compatible finetuned model to make it self-describe the weight changes. We demonstrate in two proof-of-concept settings (reporting hidden behaviors and summarizing finetuned knowledge) that our method enables models to describe their finetuning-induced modifications using concise and accurate natural language descriptions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 464e7798-2966-47a6-baeb-1d5c00596ecaCited by top-tier papers2
- Activation Oracles: Training and Evaluating LLMs as General-Purpose Activation ExplainersAdam Karvonen, James Chua, Clément Dumas, Kit Fraser-Taliente et al.ICML 2026 · 42 citations
- Introspection Adapters: Training LLMs to Report Their Learned BehaviorsKeshav Shenoy, Li Yang, Abhay Sheshadri, Jack Lindsey et al.ICML 2026 · 5 citations
Builds on22
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Trojaning Attack on Neural NetworksYingqi Liu, Shiqing Ma, Yousra Aafer, Wen-Chuan Lee et al.NDSS 2018 · 1,377 citations
- Poisoning Web-Scale Training Datasets is PracticalNicholas Carlini, Matthew Jagielski, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Daniel Paleka et al.S&P 2024 · 309 citations
- Patchscopes: A Unifying Framework for Inspecting Hidden Representations of Language ModelsAsma Ghandeharioun, Avi Caciularu, Adam Pearce, Lucas Dixon et al.ICML 2024 · 197 citations
- Fine-Tuning Enhances Existing Mechanisms: A Case Study on Entity TrackingNikhil Prakash, Tamar Rott Shaham, Tal Haklay, Yonatan Belinkov et al.ICLR 2024 · 113 citations
Related papers
- Watch the Weights: Unsupervised monitoring and control of fine-tuned LLMsZiqian Zhong, Aditi RaghunathanICLR 2026 · 7 citations
- Generalizability of Mixture of Domain-Specific Adapters from the Lens of Signed Weight Directions and its Application to Effective Model PruningTuc Nguyen, Thai LeACL 2024
- Self-Adapting Language ModelsAdam Zweiger, Jyothish Pari, Han Guo, Yoon Kim et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 78 citations
- 3-in-1: 2D Rotary Adaptation for Efficient Finetuning, Efficient Batching and ComposabilityBaohao Liao, Christof MonzNeurIPS 2024 · 14 citations
- Learning Self-Interpretation from Interpretability Artifacts: Training Lightweight Adapters on Vector-Label PairsKeenan Pepper, Alex McKenzie, Florin Pop, Stijn Servaes et al.ICML 2026
