Introspection Adapters: Training LLMs to Report Their Learned Behaviors
Keshav Shenoy, Li Yang, Abhay Sheshadri, Jack Lindsey, Samuel Marks, Rowan Wang
Abstract
Can we train LLMs to introspect, i.e. to faithfully describe their own behaviors in natural language? Prior work has shown some, limited, success. However, it is difficult to scale introspection training due to a lack of ground-truth labels. In this work, we study an approach to introspection training which side-steps this data bottleneck. Given a target model , our method works by fine-tuning models from with implanted behaviors (such as downplaying medical problems); the pairs serve as labeled introspection training data. We then train an introspection adapter (IA): a LoRA adapter jointly optimized across the fine-tunes which causes them to verbalize their implanted behaviors. This IA induces faithful introspection in fine-tunes of that were trained in very different ways from the , as well as in itself. This is surprising because the IA was never trained on . To demonstrate the utility of IAs, we use them to successfully audit misaligned models introduced in prior work. IAs can also be used to detect fine-tuning API attacks which train models to comply with encrypted harmful requests. Notably, IAs are more effective when applied to larger models. Overall, our results suggest that IAs are a scalable, effective, and practically useful approach to LLM introspection training.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on15
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought PromptingMiles Turpin, Julian Michael, Ethan Perez, Samuel R. BowmanNeurIPS 2023 · 1,792 citations
- Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!Xiangyu Qi, Yi Zeng, Tinghao Xie, Pin-Yu Chen et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,104 citations
Related papers
- Split Personality Training: Revealing Latent Knowledge Through Alternate PersonalitiesFlorian Dietz, William Wale, Oscar Gilg, Robert McCarthy et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Causal-Guided Detoxify Backdoor Attack of Open-Weight LoRA ModelsLinzhi Chen, Yang Sun, Hongru Wei, Yuqi ChenNDSS 2026 · 4 citations
- In-Training Defenses Against Emergent Misalignment in Language ModelsDavid Kaczér, Magnus Jørgenvåg, Clemens Vetter, Esha Afzal et al.ICML 2026 · 13 citations
- Looking Inward: Language Models Can Learn About Themselves by IntrospectionFelix Jedidja Binder, James Chua, Tomek Korbak, Henry Sleight et al.ICLR 2025 · 5 citations
- Finding and Reactivating Post-Trained LLMs' Hidden Safety MechanismsMingjie Li, Wai Man Si, Michael Backes, Yang Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
