Watch the Weights: Unsupervised monitoring and control of fine-tuned LLMs
Ziqian Zhong, Aditi Raghunathan
Abstract
The releases of powerful open-weight large language models (LLMs) are often not accompanied by access to their full training data. Existing interpretability methods, particularly those based on activations, often require or assume distributionally similar data. This is a significant limitation when detecting and defending against novel potential threats like backdoors, which are by definition out-of-distribution. In this work, we introduce a new method for understanding, monitoring and controlling fine-tuned LLMs that interprets weights, rather than activations, thereby sidestepping the need for data that is distributionally similar to the unknown training data. We demonstrate that the top singular vectors of the weight difference between a fine-tuned model and its base model correspond to newly acquired behaviors. By monitoring the cosine similarity of activations along these directions, we can detect salient behaviors introduced during fine-tuning with high precision. For backdoored models that bypass safety mechanisms when a secret trigger is present, our method stops up to 100% of attacks with a false positive rate below 1%. For models that have undergone unlearning, we detect inference on erased topics with accuracy up to 95.42% and can even steer the model to recover "unlearned" information. Besides monitoring, our method also shows potential for pre-deployment model auditing: by analyzing commercial instruction-tuned models (OLMo, Llama, Qwen), we are able to uncover model-specific fine-tuning focus including mathematical problem solving, emoji usage, and Midjourney prompt generation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 150c3f91-c338-4981-a83d-294b210f0ab6Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on18
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,072 citations
- HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust RefusalMantas Mazeika, Long Phan, Xuwang Yin, Andy Zou et al.ICML 2024 · 1,031 citations
- WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the WildWenting Zhao, Xiang Ren, Jack Hessel, Claire Cardie et al.ICLR 2024 · 504 citations
- LMSYS-Chat-1M: A Large-Scale Real-World LLM Conversation DatasetLianmin Zheng, Wei-Lin Chiang, Ying Sheng, Tianle Li et al.ICLR 2024 · 419 citations
- The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use with UnlearningNathaniel Li, Alexander Pan, Anjali Gopal, Summer Yue et al.ICML 2024 · 390 citations
Related papers
- Causal-Guided Detoxify Backdoor Attack of Open-Weight LoRA ModelsLinzhi Chen, Yang Sun, Hongru Wei, Yuqi ChenNDSS 2026 · 4 citations
- SGT: Securing Open-Source LLMs Against Malicious Fine-tuning via Safety Guidance TriggerSunguk Shin, Fangzhao Wu, Byung-Jun Lee, Meeyoung Cha et al.ACL 2026
- From Poisoned to Aware: Fostering Backdoor Self-Awareness in LLMsGuangyu Shen, Siyuan Cheng, Xiangzhe Xu, Yuan Zhou et al.ICML 2026
- Purifying Generative LLMs from Backdoors without Prior Knowledge or Clean ReferenceJianwei Li, Jung-Eun KimICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- Compiling Activation Steering into Weights via Null-Space Constraints for Stealthy BackdoorsRui Yin, Tianxu Han, Naen Xu, Changjiang Li et al.ACL 2026
