The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use with Unlearning
Nathaniel Li, Alexander Pan, Anjali Gopal, Summer Yue, Daniel Berrios, Alice Gatti, Justin D. Li, Ann-Kathrin Dombrowski, Shashwat Goel, Gabriel Mukobi, Nathan Helm-Burger, Rassin Lababidi
Abstract
The White House Executive Order on Artificial Intelligence highlights the risks of large language models (LLMs) empowering malicious actors in developing biological, cyber, and chemical weapons. To measure these risks of malicious use, government institutions and major AI labs are developing evaluations for hazardous capabilities in LLMs. However, current evaluations are private, preventing further research into mitigating risk. Furthermore, they focus on only a few, highly specific pathways for malicious use. To fill these gaps, we publicly release the Weapons of Mass Destruction Proxy (WMDP) benchmark, a dataset of 3,668 multiple-choice questions that serve as a proxy measurement of hazardous knowledge in biosecurity, cybersecurity, and chemical security. WMDP was developed by a consortium of academics and technical consultants, and was stringently filtered to eliminate sensitive information prior to public release. WMDP serves two roles: first, as an evaluation for hazardous knowledge in LLMs, and second, as a benchmark for unlearning methods to remove such hazardous knowledge. To guide progress on unlearning, we develop RMU, a state-of-the-art unlearning method based on controlling model representations. RMU reduces model performance on WMDP while maintaining general capabilities in areas such as biology and computer science, suggesting that unlearning may be a concrete path towards reducing malicious use from LLMs. We release our benchmark and code publicly at https://wmdp.ai
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 704b6a1f-bcb5-4248-91a2-aa256206b0b9Cited by top-tier papers155
- Improving Alignment and Robustness with Circuit BreakersAndy Zou, Long Phan, Justin Wang, Derek Duenas et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 362 citations
- Simplicity Prevails: Rethinking Negative Preference Optimization for LLM UnlearningChongyu Fan, Jiancheng Liu, Licong Lin, Jinghan Jia et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 182 citations
- Large Language Model Unlearning via Embedding-Corrupted PromptsChris Yuhao Liu, Yaxuan Wang, Jeffrey Flanigan, Yang LiuNeurIPS 2024 · 138 citations
- Soft Prompt Threats: Attacking Safety Alignment and Unlearning in Open-Source LLMs through the Embedding SpaceLeo Schwinn, David Dobre, Sophie Xhonneux, Gauthier Gidel et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 113 citations
- What Makes and Breaks Safety Fine-tuning? A Mechanistic StudySamyak Jain, Ekdeep Singh Lubana, Kemal Oksuz, Tom Joy et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 62 citations
Builds on23
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTKevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, Yonatan BelinkovNeurIPS 2022 · 3,415 citations
Related papers
- PropensityBench: Evaluating Latent Safety Risks in Large Language Models via an Agentic ApproachUdari Madhushani Sehwag, Shayan Shabihi, Alex McAvoy, Vikash Sehwag et al.ICLR 2026 · 19 citations
- ABC-Bench: An Agentic Bio-Capabilities Benchmark for BiosecurityAndrew Liu, Samira Nedungadi, Bryce Cai, Alex Kleinman et al.ICML 2026 · 6 citations
- SEPS: A Separability Measure for Robust Unlearning in LLMsWonje Jeung, Sangyeon Yoon, Albert NoEMNLP 2025
- Invariance Makes LLM Unlearning Resilient Even to Unanticipated Downstream Fine-TuningChangsheng Wang, Yihua Zhang, Jinghan Jia, Parikshit Ram et al.ICML 2025
- SoSBench: Benchmarking Safety Alignment on Six Scientific DomainsFengqing Jiang, Fengbo Ma, Zhangchen Xu, Yuetai Li et al.ICLR 2026 · 14 citations
