Invariance Makes LLM Unlearning Resilient Even to Unanticipated Downstream Fine-Tuning
Changsheng Wang, Yihua Zhang, Jinghan Jia, Parikshit Ram, Dennis Wei, Yuguang Yao, Soumyadeep Pal, Nathalie Baracaldo, Sijia Liu
Abstract
Machine unlearning presents a promising approach to mitigating privacy and safety concerns in large language models (LLMs) by enabling the selective removal of targeted data or knowledge while preserving model utility. However, existing unlearning methods remain over-sensitive to downstream fine-tuning, which can rapidly recover what is supposed to be unlearned information even when the fine-tuning task is entirely unrelated to the unlearning objective. To enhance robustness, we introduce the concept of ‘invariance’ into unlearning for the first time from the perspective of invariant risk minimization (IRM), a principle for environment-agnostic training. By leveraging IRM, we develop a new invariance-regularized LLM unlearning framework, termed invariant LLM unlearning (ILU). We show that the proposed invariance regularization, even using only a single fine-tuning dataset during ILU training, can enable unlearning robustness to generalize effectively across diverse and new fine-tuning tasks at test time. A task vector analysis is also provided to further elucidate the rationale behind ILU’s effectiveness. Extensive experiments on the WMDP benchmark, which focuses on removing an LLM’s hazardous knowledge generation capabilities, reveal that ILU significantly outperforms state-of-the-art unlearning methods, including negative preference optimization (NPO) and representation misdirection for unlearning (RMU). Notably, ILU achieves superior unlearning robustness across diverse downstream fine-tuning scenarios (e.g., math, paraphrase detection, and sentiment analysis) while preserving the fine-tuning performance.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Panacea: Mitigating Harmful Fine-tuning for Large Language Models via Post-fine-tuning PerturbationYibo Wang, Tiansheng Huang, Li Shen, Huanjin Yao et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 22 citations
- Surgery: Mitigating Harmful Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models via Attention SinkGuozhi Liu, Weiwei Lin, Tiansheng Huang, Ruichao Mo et al.ICML 2026 · 5 citations
- Downgrade to Upgrade: Optimizer Simplification Enhances Robustness in LLM UnlearningYicheng Lang, Yihua Zhang, Chongyu Fan, Changsheng Wang et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
Builds on22
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTKevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, Yonatan BelinkovNeurIPS 2022 · 3,415 citations
- Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Risk Extrapolation (REx)David Krueger, Ethan Caballero, Jörn-Henrik Jacobsen, Amy Zhang et al.ICML 2021 · 1,163 citations
- Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!Xiangyu Qi, Yi Zeng, Tinghao Xie, Pin-Yu Chen et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,104 citations
- The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use with UnlearningNathaniel Li, Alexander Pan, Anjali Gopal, Summer Yue et al.ICML 2024 · 390 citations
Related papers
- Elastic Robust Unlearning of Specific Knowledge in Large Language ModelsYize Sui, Jing Ren, Wenjing Yang, Ruochun Jin et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- A Robust Unlearning Method with Adaptive Knowledge Guidance and Memory PreservationJingyuan Tian, Xiaofei ZhouAAAI 2026
- Explainable LLM Unlearning through ReasoningJunfeng Liao, Qizhou Wang, Shanshan Ye, Xin Yu et al.ICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- LLM Unlearning Should Be Form-IndependentXiaotian Ye, Mengqi Zhang, Shu WuS&P 2026 · 3 citations
- ZeroUnlearn: Few-Shot Knowledge Unlearning in Large Language ModelsYujie Lin, Chengyi Yang, Zhishang Xiang, YIPING SONG et al.ICML 2026
